Friday, November 2, 2012

11/2/12 Get long or hibernate

The market likes to travel light, which is another way of saying it enjoys inflicting maximum pain on the majority of traders (stealing a riff from Landry here). I still think an extended bear is likely for most of 2013, but given the number of negative viewpoints playing right now, the only way down is to first spike up! New highs in the next few weeks will force shorts to cover, and may also force underinvested fund managers to chase. When Newsweek comes out with its next 'nothing but blue skies' cover story on the stock market (probably around February 2013), the bear will emerge. I see two ways to play this scenario: (a) go long on the next pullback and hold until negative sentiment disappears, or (b) simply hibernate until the bear emerges and then go short.

116 comments:

  1. or just go long YRCW 2nd. They will try to shake people out in the short term but there is huge leverage in this business even in a weak economy. it's all about price to sales.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Market seems to overlook the fact every trucker totes a leverage device(crowbar). ;)

      Delete
  2. AIG banks 2b in profits, and gets sold off -5%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2b was priced in, or maybe now hurricane damage impact is being priced in?

      Shakeout, or
      Retest 100sma?
      Retest 200sma?

      Delete
  3. Possible pullback scenario...

    Peter Ghostine ‏@61point8
    Focusing on this chart of $SPX. Played out phenomenally well.
    http://charts.61point8.com/20121102-spx-3.png …

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Anything short of an unexpected positive surprise on the jobs front(causes market trend down, see blue arrow)"

      So the questions are:

      1) Does this morning's report qualify as an unexpected positive surprise?

      2) How do we qualify an unexpected positive surprise?

      Delete
    2. 61p8 published the chart last night. ADP was above expectations and took some of the up-side surprise out of today's number. Also from yday..

      Peter Ghostine ‏@61point8
      A classic sell-the-news setup for tomorrow.

      Currently,

      verniman ‏@verniman
      $ES_F: Be careful about the daily POC moving lower to 1423. Bears open the door of 1415 as new bearish target. http://twitpic.com/b9nq5l

      Delete
    3. I kinda like this chart, note how commercials have repositioned themselves the past couple months:

      http://www.finviz.com/futures_charts.ashx?t=DX&p=d1

      The thing is these constant twists and turns result in endless coiling....?

      Delete
    4. Yep, sell the news. Interesting how a stronger dollar based on economic improvement necessitates selling, seems downside should be self-limiting as long as the dollar doesn't move past some level, say 82 perhaps?

      Delete
  4. Bought a bit of some scam penny stock AMBS at $0.0306 based solely on hype and the expectation that the boiler rooms will pump it higher. Oh and volume looks good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I admire those plays, much more honest than most of the remainder of the market.

      Delete
  5. F - Remember when this one was $9.30 ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. CADC - Speaking of junk, briefly moved over $1 this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gold, there's that $30 move everyone was harping over the past couple weeks...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting take from Bill Gross.

    http://www.pimco.com/EN/Insights/Pages/Time-To-Vote.aspx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bingo on all counts, look no further than the sweeping of global warming issues under the rug. I think the public has taken notice though, and Romney's on the wrong side(currently a timing issue).

      Meanwhile, buy offshore special interest groups.

      Delete
    2. The real shocker though is how cheaply these politicians sell us out, leads me to conclude there's much more to the deals than encompassed in public disclosures.

      Delete
  9. AGO - I should've noticed $13.61 was a logical support level making $13.64 (a few cents higher) a likely place for buyers to appear and sellers to balk.

    ReplyDelete
  10. GGB - Yesterday's dip to $8.50 was bought with both hands, I was hoping it would fall under $8 just for me...

    ReplyDelete
  11. 2nd - "Get long or hibernate"

    Can I just distill your strategy to -> "Play the bounce"?

    Arash - Has anyone heard from this guy lately?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Serious question... 1-So do we accept global warning as fact. 2- Is it mostly caused by man made polution. 3- If we answer yes to 1 and 2 is it really that big of a deal right now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. Yes.
      2. Yes.
      3. Yes.

      Additional: High CO2 not only warms the atmosphere, it acidifies oceans. We get a lot of food from the oceans, they regulate much of our weather and they are the basis of the global food chain. The coral reefs make the amazonian rain forests look like deserts in terms of biodiversity. With dead oceans it's all over but the crying. Not only are the oceans acidified, but our soils are being degraded as well.

      IMO there is a lot of misdirection attended to "global warming" or "climate change" but it is our food sources, seas and soil that are most in danger.

      The source of the soil infor is Washington State University where they are doing farm plot studies on how 350PPM plus CO2 changes soil composition.

      My source of info on ocean acidification is the University of Washington, and since I live in a shell fish farming area, local shell fish farmers. We haven't had natural oyster propagation in the Puget Sound for over ten years now and the UW studies it since it is a huge economic issue here. Baby oyster shells are dissolving due to low PH/higher acidity due to higher water CO2 levels. As a former reef aquarist, this is simple water chemistry. In reef keeping we have what is known as a "calcium reactor" which is a tube full of calcium carbonate shells of clams/oysters, etc. with a flow of water and a drip system that injects CO2 to dissolve the shells. The tube is tall enough that the CO2 escapes before the water enters the aquarium so the aquarium inhabitants don't dissolve but the calcium carbonate content of the resulting water is used by the inhabitants to grow. So, the results of CO2 acidification on calcium carbonate shells of sea life is well established undebateable science. Here is one to look at: http://www.marinedepot.com/AquaMaxx_Nano_Star_Calcium_Reactor_Calcium_Reactors-AquaMaxx-UJ00170-FICRRA-vi.html

      http://www.proteinskimmer.com/Articles/How%20do%20calcium%20reactors%20work.htm


      In other words, we are in MUCH bigger trouble than we think. We MUST lower CO2 below 350 PPM or we are done.

      Delete
    2. I find it very strange how the US public seems to be more preoccupied with space exploration than oceanography. The quantity of plastic trash that washes out(or is dumped) to sea alone, is just astonishing.

      Be very careful walking on the beaches of southern Tx.(same is true almost globally these days) especially following a syringe tide.

      Delete
    3. Truly. We seem captivated by finding water or signs of life on some distant planet yet we have oceans full of the stuff and forms of life yet undiscovered right here. We have fundamentalists getting all crazy about cloning while it happens on a daily basis in our oceans.

      We all see it re: economics. Ever try talking to regular people about money? For something they make such a big show of working for, they know next to nothing about it or how to make or grow it. Let's face it, Americans are fricking stupid.

      Delete
  13. Why am I far less inclined to donate to the folks on the shore as I was to the folks in Katrina's path?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. maybe it's partly because of stuff like this ...

      Eric Wilkinson ‏@Wolfmansblog
      things not that dire... Non-Union Utility Crews from Alabama Told to Leave NJ: Report http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Non-Union-Utility-Crews-from-Alabama-Turned-Away-From-Helping-NJ-Sandy-Victims-176949061.html … via@nbcphiladelphia

      Delete
    2. or this ...

      David Busick ‏@TheFibDoctor
      RT @LuciSkydyme: Manhattan, Long Island, Staten Island lousy locations for a city anyway > Manhattan should be given back to the Indians.

      Delete
    3. Green Acres is the place to be, but ecologically speaking there's something to be said for dense cities vs urban sprawl.

      Delete
    4. That's right. Let's move the Mafiosi and the bankers to Detroit or something.

      Delete
  14. I am glad that I am not a trader of PM miners -- otherwise I would be pulling my hair out and selling my positions at a loss. Being an investor, however, I am simply rejoicing upon seeing better prices for the same great companies. One thing saddens be today, though -- I have ran out of cash to buy. The only thing left to me is to make "lateral moves." So I just sold 1000 shares of AUMN an used that money to buy 17 contracts of April $2.50 calls at $1.75. Maybe today's washout was just what was needed to get the sentiment in PMs down to the floor and start the next rally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MUX coiled almost to the end of it's pennant, a sure sign the initial breakout would be false.

      Delete
    2. BTW, I still expect silver will test the $26 neckline. FWIW

      Delete
  15. David- Of all the sectors you could have picked, why junior miners?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I've been following Geoff's posts for the past several weeks. So there is no doubt in my mind that a significant percentage of readers piled into MUX/SLW yesterday. I sincerely hope it's the 'final washout' scenario we're seeing here. O/w...

    ReplyDelete
  17. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/190-bottles-of-beer-on-the-wall-2012-11-02?link=MW_home_latest_news

    ReplyDelete
  18. Moving back down through the lower portion of the short covering "P" from yday ...

    http://shadowtrader.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/121102profile.gif

    verniman ‏@verniman
    $ES_F: Finally 1411 was hit and market find some balance and we see some responsive buyers. Profile completed. http://twitpic.com/b9pvjt 

    vader ‏@vader7x
    if ES closes under 1409.. real damage done and would be concerning. until then, its time to drink and start the weekend

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what I like to hear. Common sense mixed with alcohol.

      Delete
    2. LOL! Mixed with...or fueled by?

      Delete
    3. Right there with you man -- Doing my part!!!

      BamaTrader ‏@BamaTrader
      Today's PROF doesn't look any better than yesterday. This mkt is in real danger here, imo. Could see another 1402 print on Mon...even today.

      Delete
  19. "David- Of all the sectors you could have picked, why junior miners?"

    Because they were the most undervalued sector on my radar this summer, with the best future fundamentals (since, as I described many times, the steady growth of US Debt/GDP ratio will keep propelling gold/silver up). I just need to wait out the local market insanity. I have taken the extra risk with my call options, and if this insanity lasts until next April, then all my April $5 calls on AUMN will expire worthless. The specific company I chose inside of the junior mining sector, AUMN, is supposed to be steadily growing its production from now on, and so its shares are supposed to rise even if gold/silver remain flat. This story is very clear to me, but for some reason it is not playing out yet...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Incidentally, it is amazing that GDXJ has held up so well over the past 6 weeks, being down less than SLV over this time frame! This has never happened before! Even today, GDXJ is still above its October low, while SLV broke down way below it. The PM traders have to be sensing that this pullback in SLV/GLD is very temporary in nature...

    ReplyDelete
  21. IRE looks good today, relatively speaking.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hmmmm.....some one is taking this market behind the shed and shooting it. AAPL down 3.5%? They know what they are doing.

    Probably a good time to sell the QID and cover the IBB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was hoping for a move to 1100 SPX, so we can get the shenanigans behind us. I know, that's asking way too much....

      Thus no doubt you're right, time to cover, go long rinse and repeat to infinity.

      Delete
    2. AAPL has had a huge impact on the downturn in the market. Down almost 20%. Think about how much of an impact that has on the market given its weighting.

      Delete
    3. Interesting read on APPL at http://www.businessinsider.com/dear-apple-im-leaving-you-2012-11

      Reality is AAPL is in a tough place as a stock. Think of DECK when it was over $100 and all the UGG knockoffs for 10% of the price were coming to market and they were losing their cool factor - that is AAPL now - cheap Androids, new Blackberry's and Windows phones, running out of consumers who will pay $600 for a phone and, in my opinion, nothing really new for the last couple of years.

      APPL, because their market cap is so high, has to do absolutely everything right and it still may not be enough. I am almost certain it will be a much lower stock at some point, but I've had bad timing on shorting stocks in the past, so will probably just stay away.

      Delete
  23. Everyone have a great weekend. That's an ORDER! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  24. In case the PM sector (and AUMN) stays weak until the elections, I placed buy limit orders for 10 contracts of AUMN April $2.50 calls at $1.60 and $1.50.

    ReplyDelete
  25. David,

    The problems for AUMN are:

    1. Price takers for Silver, no margin control
    2. Silver is still up almost 10-fold in the last 10 years, so further price increases will be increasingly difficult
    3. I know you disagree, but in my opinion the link between government deficits and PM prices is not strong. Silver went down for 20 years starting in 1980 even though the government was in deficit.
    4. Margins for the miners are getting compressed due to higher costs. See ABX's release this week.
    5. Silver miners in particular have a tough time making profits off their mines - when I look back through the silver miners I have looked at, almost all have had problems with costs, grades, etc.


    So, for AUMN specifically, they do have valuable assets, but I really don't think they will get a good valuation until the mines are in production and they are generating profits and maybe even paying dividends. Hopefully they can do this while prices are still high and they control their costs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and I'd also add, diversification is always good as anyone can be wrong anytime.

      What if PM prices do stay down? What if someone develops a way to get silver out of sea water for $1 per ounce? Point is, you never know.

      Same for me, I like insurance, but what if interest rates stay down and they can reinvest effectively for 20 years like Japan? I like energy stocks, but what if North Dakota oil can be produced for $8 per barrel and pulls all oil prices way down?

      Gotta diversify and take some of that risk off the table.

      Delete
  26. 2nd, re AIG, I think the issue is that their combined ratio for P&C claims was 105 (105% or premiums paid out in claims). People value AIG based on the value of their P&C business plus the life business, but the P&C business is the more important part, so if it is not executing well, why not move on to another P&C company which is (and many are right now).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alright. What do you recommend?

      Delete
    2. AIG is actually probably good to buy on the selloff. The good thing about have a high combined ratio is you can fix it through disciplined underwriting and claims management, so you can increase your earnings and drive the stock price up. AIG is complex, but it is less so than it used to be and a lot of the really smart value guys who have gone through the filings in detail are buying, so I'd have no issue buying here.

      I personally don't own it as I own MET for large cap life and L for P&C (gives a combo of P&C insurance through CNA and offshore drilling through DO), but I've been doing some more looking at AIG and from what I've seen so far, looks good.

      I also own some small caps which are great value and opportunities that I can give you info on if you want, but I don't think they'd fit well with your in and out style of trading. They are more buy and wait type stocks.

      Delete
  27. Half a bottle into a Cab. OK, so the first name on the bottle is Chuck. So I'm a buck into the bottle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a regular around here. That, the Merlot and Chardonnay. Every once in awhile I head over to the $3.99 section and take home a La Finca Malbec.

      When it get more involved we go with the Kirkland Anejo Tequila, a good brand of orange liqueur and the Costco marg mix with cane sugar. Tonight feels like a Malbec evening.

      Delete
    2. Next time I stop in, I'll make it a Malbec.

      Delete
  28. UGAZ down -11%? So much for negative correlation. Something's up, and it's not the indexes, yo. Seriously, something's wrong with the action the past two days. We get the dead cat bounce, then sell off on the better-than-expected-good-enough-to-'relect'-Bernanke employment report?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mean Bernanke. What does the market care about Obama?

      Delete
  29. Even Deron must be getting stopped out on half of his positions (UNG, SIL, TMF). The only guy left standing is the TFM!

    ReplyDelete
  30. David- I don't know how you (and cb with RBY) do it. The only way I would be able to handle it is to open the position and blindfold myself- set an alarm to trigger when it hits my target or something. Watching prices on a daily basis would definitely do me in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I started investing/trading in 2006, I had nerves as soft as a rubber, marking my positions to market every day and imagining what I could have done with the money I just lost. Over time, however, I gradually replaced my old nerves with new ones, made of steel.

      The Buddhist training of not looking at the world egocentrically (not imagining myself being in the center of the world, with life happening TO me) but instead perceiving the world as a collection of processes that keep evolving over time is also helping me to stay sane. In fact, I probably feel myself overall happier now than ever before, having recently realized that I am finally ready to let my Ego disappear, give up everything that I "have" or "might have" (and correspondingly stop trying to gain anything for MYSELF in this life or optimize it to my own liking in any way) and instead move in harmony with the evolving processes of life, doing what NEEDS to be done at every moment.

      Delete
    2. Bro- when AUMN hits 20, I want to hear the same speech.

      Delete
    3. When AUMN hits 20, I'm going to buy a $190 bottle of Samuel Adams.

      Delete
    4. Maybe that insane and unexplainable decoupling of AUMN from GDXJ post-FOMC was the final push that the fate had to give me in order to get me to acknowledge that I am ready to give up my life and become just a servant of REALITY. I really hope that when AUMN hits $20, I'll still stick with this path and will not slide into personal indulgence...

      Delete
    5. I'm a firm believer in the theory that there's a reason for everything that happens, a reason for every experience. I can also attest to the fact that occasionally (actually, more than occasionally) it takes 30-40 years to 'understand.' In the end, it's all good.

      Delete
  31. You know what? The sixth sense was right.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I was hoping for a post-close. Something along the lines of 'we backed up the truck on MUX,' or 'we were stopped out of MUX.'

    ReplyDelete
  33. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-win-may-result-in-housing-stimulus-analyst-2012-11-02

    Every sliver of info helps.

    ReplyDelete
  34. good afternoon folks

    Did a little buying last Thursday. Bot dec calls on QQQ and IWM since I knew we were going higher. Now I'll hold them till they reach my $500 stop limit.

    Stop loss on my IWM position will probably be around IWM at $80, it closed at 81.19 so that puts it below last weeks low in IWM.

    Stop loss on QQQ will be around QQQ at $64.25 which also below last weeks low. Not much room on either positions.

    Added more ANR at 8.92. I was all excited early Friday morn when ANR traded up to $9.71 and then watched it drift down for the rest of the day. I should have sold half at 9.60.

    Still have my RIMM and DSX shares with stops in place. These guys are just waffling around in a trading range.

    ReplyDelete
  35. At this point, all I plan on doing before the election is maintaining existing positions by honoring stops and sell targets.

    On Tuesday, I may take a look at a short term strangle on one of the etf's. One of my reads mentioned that he bets we won't have a final determination on a president on Wednesday morn.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Mark, I got the following e-mail from John Mauldin yesterday:

    "Dear Investor,

    It won't be long before the United States is finally, and permanently, energy independent.

    With new technology, American energy companies are going gangbusters. They've increased our daily oil production to 6.5 million barrels per day, a 15-year high.

    As a result, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports they've also slashed our dependence on foreign energy from a whopping 60.3% in 2005 to a hair over 49% today.

    That is simply astounding progress. Coupled with our country's rich natural gas and other hydrocarbon reserves, we can now all be proud that energy independence could be less than 20 years away.

    "We have found so much natural gas and oil in this country, with new procedures and new technology, that we can become energy independent in less than 20 years, maybe even by the end of the decade."

    According to a recent report from the Manhattan Institute, the United States is now the fastest-growing producer of oil and natural gas in the world.

    Over the next two decades, domestic energy sources could provide as much as $5 trillion in revenue and up to $2 trillion in tax receipts to federal and local governments. What's more, millions of energy-related jobs will be created throughout the entire US economy.

    In fact, just imagine what the weak US economy would be like right now if the energy sector weren't so bright.

    Our country's vast natural gas reserves have already revived many local and state economies by providing tax revenues and high-paying job opportunities in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and especially North Dakota where an economic boom is occurring.

    The Marcellus Shale Formation alone has already created an estimated 60,000 jobs and is expected to create another 200,000 jobs by 2015.

    All told, a recent report from the Natural Gas Caucus shows that over 2.8 million jobs have already been created by the natural gas industry.

    Plus, with natural gas prices near 10-year lows, we believe select investments in natural gas companies with high dividend yields could be one of the single best decisions you make for your portfolio."

    Does this match your take on the future?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "In fact, just imagine what the weak US economy would be like right now if the energy sector weren't so bright."

      Why do people feel the need to be so negative? I like it better like this, "just imagine what the US economy would be like if the housing market improves and causes banks to lend more".

      Delete
    2. My observation is the housing market has improved, dramatically, and continues to improve.

      I still expect WS intends on extracting their pound of flesh, just look at how they've treated PM fans.

      Delete
  37. Pantanal Piranha soup - Have you tried it? This dish has an distinctive bite to it.

    ReplyDelete
  38. David,

    in case you didn't see this, PWC seeing things picking up for the junior miners:

    http://business.financialpost.com/2012/11/05/glimmers-of-hope-for-junior-miners-after-slow-moving-investment-nightmare/

    ReplyDelete
  39. Still need to test 1403 I guess, will it hold?

    Umm, what happened to our presidential election rally?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1409 seems to be getting a lot of attention.

      Delete
  40. David- I'll get back to you on the energy question.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forgot to reply to your question David - I think what he is saying is mostly accurate, although a lot can happen between now and 20 years from now and "permanent" is a long time.

      But, most of the smart value guys are looking at Nat Gas or have made purchases in Nat Gas already as it almost certain to get better than it is now. You can argue whether the best way to play this is through the E&P companies, the service companies or the pipelines/processors, but pretty much all nat gas related stocks are still very cheap.

      Delete
    2. My question on energy is, why would we anticipate substantial upside for energy producers if price of oil falls to ~$50 due to increased production?

      I would call it a substantial "piece dividend", which can only be considered an economical positive.

      Car sales, equipment sales, etc, etc.

      aside: BC has been on a tear.

      Delete
  41. That POS penny stock I bought is up about 33% from when I bought it. Debating if I should hold till it hits the moon, which is the target by all of the analysts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does the business model make any sense at all? Could be one of those 3000% movers?

      What's the probability?

      Delete
    2. honestly, i looked at two things: (1) volume and (2) market cap. It's a pump and dump stock so it's a matter of figuring out when the real dump comes. i think with it being in the biotech sector and biotechs being so in favor, it could run to $0.30 or so. market cap would be like $40 Million which isn't that crazy.

      Delete
  42. HII - Just keeps roaring higher. Man, is this thing ever gonna experience an appreciative pullback?

    ReplyDelete
  43. I'm expecting a slow, steady climb for YRCW over the course of the next several months. Never any big daily runs that land it on the leading gainers list...just slow and steady stealth move higher. The fact is this company is within spitting distance of positive net income after years of massive losses. They have insider buying. They have no major debt deadlines for the next 2 years. And they're trading at 0.01 price to sales (vs $0.40 or so for industry) and an equally ridiculous 0.20 times trailing twelve months EBIDTA (vs 7 or so for industry).

    ReplyDelete
  44. DECK sure looks like it's gonna fill the gap...all the way up to $35.

    ReplyDelete
  45. jeez this penny stock is now up 68% today. wtf. now i know why people get hooked on these pump and dump scams.

    ReplyDelete
  46. UNG - Seems like the 50SMA might hold, should we be buying now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NG infrastructure is mostly intact in NE...expecting a Noreaster in a few days.

      Delete
  47. "David, in case you didn't see this, PWC seeing things picking up for the junior miners..."

    Thank you for the link, BB! Keep them coming -- any little bit of encouragement helps in these dire times. :) What strikes me strange about AUMN, though, is after raising enough cash at $5.75 to achieve their production goals, their stock plunged to $4! That doesn't make any sense to me, since they haven't even spent that cash yet, and this cash dispelled the last bit of uncertainty about the company (prior to that, some investors might have wondered how are they going to achieve their production expansion if they don't have the cash to do that). So while the article you sent me is correct about the lack of financing being a big headwind for exploration companies, AUMN is out of that league now, but it is still not zooming up! WTF???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look at all the downgradez on ABX this week. If a ABX can't make money do to current cost pressures and they are supposed to be 1 of the best how are the little guys supposed to do it?

      Delete
    2. After a decade long boom in precious metals I see far more enticing places to put my money. YRCW is about the best one out there but there are still a good deal of beaten down broken sectors with stocks in those sectors that will one day rise from the dead. I wouldn't classify precious metals as beaten down. However, that doesn't mean there won't be companies within the sector that will do well. It's just that I think it will be a lot tougher to make money in that sector given the stupendous results it has had over the years.

      Delete
    3. I agree with TOF on this completely. Like I said a couple of days ago. no-one is going to pay up for the juniors unless PM prices start a new large move upwards or they get their mines to production. The only thing I have in the PM space is a company that does drilling for the miners (both junior and senior) called Cabo Drilling (CBEEF), but it is trading at a P/E of 2, so I'd say the bad metals market is pretty fully priced in.

      YRCW could be a 20-banger over several years if they execute well (or they could go bankrupt if things go poorly, so I personally wouldn't make it a large position).

      But, I definitely agree that there are many easier places to make money than PM's at this time.

      Delete
  48. BOIL - Looks like 50SMA is crossing up through 200SMA

    ReplyDelete
  49. AGO - Closing better than it's opening price would be a positive event.

    Go, go, gogogogogo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone killed it in the last minute - ahhhh!

      I'm really not worried about how it trades. Almost certainly it will be worth a lot more in a couple of years. If I'm completely wrong or missed something here, I don't see it and wouldn't sell on a pullback and would be more likely to buy (unless some unexpected bad news comes), but it seems that there are buyers around $13.50

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I'm thinking this is a pre-earnings shakeout that might possibly move momentarily to $12 at which time I intend on adding assuming the news isn't dire(how could it be that bad?). Otherwise I'm content with my entry and am inclined to add based on action post-earnings.

      Still chuckling over TOF's penny junk 68% gain..... ;)

      Delete
    3. What do you make of the insider selling though, I forget if we've already discussed this?

      Delete
    4. I pulled the Vickers Insider Report and see almost all buys and few sells and none since April - where are you seeing this?

      Delete
    5. I was going off the finviz data but it's frequently inaccurate.

      http://www.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=ago&ty=c&ta=1&p=d

      Delete
  50. Interview with YRCW's CEO:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/video/yrc-trailers-backed-up-after-sandy-ceo-says-6Z5lRRQuQiu~VDRfemN1tA.html

    Gotta love how this guy isn't pumping up the business/stock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I liked it. He speaks well. The hot chick didn't hurt either...

      Delete
  51. Take a look at this one. Might be worth a shot....

    http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Analysts+Expect+Expect+FDA+to+Approve+Heartware+Intls+%28HTWR%29+HVAD+%22Any+Day%22/7760987.html?si_client=st

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have no idea how to play these types of stocks - to me it is a gamble on the FDA and usually the downside is pretty severe if the decision goes the wrong way.

      Delete
    2. Yep, or you get a BMRN like today. That's been a LT hold for me...Sadly it is only 1 share.

      Delete
  52. NLY - Ouch, $0.50 is a big smackdown.... Had to lower my stink bid on this one from $15.25 to $14.75, see if it can give up another $0.50

    ReplyDelete