Thursday, April 7, 2011

4/7/11 'Low volume doesn't cancel buy signal'/ Cleared for takeoff

http://tinyurl.com/3lrrvun

At long last, a common sense take on the low volumes behind the 2-year rally. And why it's not necessarily a bearish sign. From a sentiment angle, I think we're good for a move to 1400.

There are also a lot of potential equity-market participants, such as retail and other long-term, buy-and-hold-type investors, who remain skeptical after two crashes in 10 years. “There’s still a thought that the market is pretty treacherous,” said Hinsdale Associates director of investments Andrew Fitzpatrick. It’s one thing to be burned once, but twice?

In addition, there are a lot of fundamental headwinds to keep investors cautious, such as such as surging oil prices, the nuclear crisis in Japan, European sovereign-debt concerns, and the big one: uncertainty surrounding what might happen if or when the Federal Reserve ends the latest round of monetary stimulus, as scheduled in June.

Basically, volumes are low now because of fear and skepticism, not because bulls have had their fill of stocks. In that case, the lack of participation shouldn’t detract from the Dow Theory’s buy signal.

If volume had increased steadily after the bull market began in March 2009, and again emerged in July 2010, then declining volumes at a new high would be a warning signal. “If [investors] were all in, and volumes were low, then there would be a concern,” Kleintop said. But the “inordinate amount of cash on the sidelines” suggests that’s just not the case.

26 comments:

  1. The earthquake + premature tsunami alert cleared the overbought roadblock I was concerned about (no disrespect intended, of course, to the Japanese).

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was the best thing that could have happened- a non-event event that scared the ---- out of weak hands.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looking back, every time Vad has issued one of his 'This just sent the market down screaming' alerts, it's been a buy signal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. guys - i'd recommend keeping this IPO on your radar: Zipcar (ZIP):
    http://gaskinsco.com/linkto-aa-include-iporated-calendar-101.shtml

    They are growing revenues rapidly and with oil going higher and higher I think this could be a nice play. I have no idea what the market cap of the company will be after the IPO but if it drops at all I think it should be bought and held.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see Zipcars all over San Francisco.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To get from SPX 1330 to SPX 1500 requires passing through SPX 1400. Why not sooner rather than later? Why must we retrace to 1250 or some other downside target? Six months ago posting 1300 might as well have been sacrilegious- now it's a support level, for crying out loud.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ZIP - That one might be interesting, we should start studying it.

    GMO - For the umpteenth time I passed up selling in the $5.80's to turn around and re-buy in the $5.40's. I guess I'm gonna have to start doing this since obviously it's not going to hang onto the upper $5's until good news appears...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Update

    HERO also saying it has been hurt by higher production costs due to the rising cost of oil.

    More to follow...

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/zipcar-ipo/1478

    I'd love to see a mild opening day pop on this stock but I doubt it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I do want to have more GMO, since this stock can (and most likely will) go up 10X over the next 3 years if it gets all the necessary permits. I placed today a sell limit order for 10 May $6 puts on GMO at $0.85 and that order is still open, GTC.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A ten bagger david? Wow that would be sometthing. Im looking for one of those but not in the metals space bc they're too cyclical for me and have been bullish for sooo long

    ReplyDelete
  12. TOF, remember the post I made on GMO? It will likely have $7/share in free cashflow annually between 2014 and 2020. How much do you think the stock will be worth at that point?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Re: 'Low volume doesn't cancel buy signal'/ SPX 1400 newSubmitted by 2nd_ave (5474 comments) on Thu, 04/07/2011 - 20:18 #83404 (in reply to #83399)
    jack-

    Is it possible that low volume has in fact been the driver for this 2-year rally in more ways than one? No participation. Might it make more sense to 'simply not buy' into the survey results? How much cash sits on the sidelines, anyway? How much cash was lost in the 2008 Crash? How much has been withdrawn to pay bills? For that matter, how many 'individual investors' remain?

    A mere six months ago posting a target of SPX 1300 might as well have been sacrilegious- no one believed it. Now 1300 is a 'support level,' for crying out loud. If 'low volume' can rocket the SPX up an unimaginable 30% in that time period, then SPX 1400 within the next few months (the next few weeks, even) is not unreasonable when talking about a rally that has few well-understood drivers or precedents.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I love the skepticism out there. There is no better driver for a rally than disbelief.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well, PM's are bullish for quite a long time also but maybe not cyclical anymore. As for moly, it's required in stainless steel metallurgy as we know it. Not a bad market going forward.

    ReplyDelete
  16. David - I hate to ask this b/c i prob asked it before, but could you share your calculations with me on GMO?

    ReplyDelete
  17. David - one other thing...what's the likelihood that they don't get permit approvals and can't operate the mine? Also, are there assurances that what they're mining is actually in the ground?

    ReplyDelete
  18. http://blogs.forbes.com/jamestaylor/2011/03/30/the-senates-epa-vote-will-help-determine-our-economic-future/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Has anyone checked to see if there are warrants for GMO? I wouldn't be surprised to see there are. HEK for example would be trading @ 10 right now if there weren't.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Looks like I'm gonna get my hand slapped for a couple hundred bucks on my SLW short.

    ReplyDelete
  21. TOF, luckily for you, I copied my post about GMO into a file, since I suspected that I'll need it later. :) Here it is:

    They can't control how quickly the permits come. They hope to get permits in late 2011, but they can be delayed until 2012. After getting the permits, they will start constructing the mine. It takes 20 month to build the mine. They eat through cash at about $3M/year (so if permits are delayed until late 2012, they may need to raise a few more $M, which is not that significant). They will have 111M shares outstanding once all loans from Hanlong are received.

    Once the mine is constructed, all-inclusive cost of moly sold will be $6.25/lb on average for the first 5 years. They plan to produce 40M lb/year on average for the first 5 years. GMO owns 80% of that production. Life of mine – 40 years. After 5 years, cost starts going slightly up, and production starts going slightly down. After 40 years, cost goes up to $8 and $9, and production goes down to 25M lb/year.

    So assuming moly at $30/lb on average between 2014 and 2020, GMO will have about $770M in free cashflow per year, which translates into about $7 of cashflow per share for the first 5 years, which is about 1.5X of its current share price. Wow... This is a much better deal than RBY, which will have annual cashflow of 0.25X its current share price.

    ReplyDelete
  22. David - what is the historical average price of a lb of moly?

    ReplyDelete
  23. TOF, you can get the historical moly price from this site:

    http://www.infomine.com/investment/metalprices/

    As you will see, the price of GMO tracks the moly price pretty well.

    ReplyDelete
  24. David > Is moly the same as Molybdenum Oxide? If so would this chart be the appropriate historical one:
    http://www.infomine.com/chartsanddata/chartbuilder.aspx?z=f&g=127676&dr=15y

    ReplyDelete
  25. MoOx will reach $20 sometime between now and end of year.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ding, ding, ding! Silver $40 in advance of July schedule...

    ReplyDelete