Sunday, September 15, 2013

09/15/13 The Big Picture

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1533818/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl The above is my latest recommendation for downloading from NFLX. A successful lawyer loses everything, which ironically gives him the balls (an actual quote from the film) to live the life he's always wanted. A lesson for us here? Sure. I'll let you figure it out for yourselves.

117 comments:

  1. holy sh*t anyone see the futures?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When the world's stock markets go up 1% in total value on the account of you withdrawing from consideration of a job that's gotta have an impact on you mentally right?

      Delete
    2. Andrew Busch ‏@abusch
      This Summers news and Syrian send stocks to new highs http://bloom.bg/16aNDS8 via @BloombergNews

      Delete
    3. The impact could be experienced in many different ways on many different levels. For Summers, it probably further inflates his ego, knowing a decision he announced had repercussions around the globe.

      Delete
  2. I would remain alert for all kinds of cross currents. Gold/silver could spike either way on the news. Futures can easily reverse by morning. Bond prices might be the most reliable barometer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally, I'm comfortably holding cash and hoping to take advantage of any favorable setups that catch my attention.

      Delete
  3. What...what??? Did Summers say something about GMO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been there, bro. Aliens could be landing, and my only concern would be the effect on gold prices.

      Delete
    2. That's funny man! For such a small position it's like water torture.

      Delete
  4. Well, the general consensus was that Summers would move to withdraw QE and so now he's withdrawn, the thought is it's less likely, right?

    Not sure how that could necessarily be bad for equities market since it's generally thought monetary easing has been an elixir?

    ReplyDelete
  5. mREITs - Wonder why most of these rallied last week, and notice that the 10yr only reached 3% or so, my target was 3.15%

    Okay, so rates are still low and it's really hard to argue they should stay this way, right?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm actually really glad Summers is out. What a joke he really is.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Summers would have been a bad, politicized appointment. Not sure why Obama doesn't seem to like Yellen though as she is very dovish.

    Will be interesting to see who the new alternative choice is. Obama doesn't want to have no options.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's likely Yellen. Not sure where the Obama dislike comes from? Wasn't aware of that so you have me questioning myself again as usual.

      Delete
  8. If anyone still has faith in Hussman as a market timer, this guy has a great chart showing when he started his "overvalued" thesis:

    http://oldprof.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451ddb269e2019aff5b2273970d-popup

    ReplyDelete
  9. CP,

    You were asking about rates. From Hulbert:

    Yet there is no consistent historical relationship between interest rates and the stock market, says Javier Estrada, a professor of finance at the IESE Business School in Barcelona.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/when-interest-rates-rise-should-you-sell-stocks-2013-09-13?link=MW_story_investinginsight

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure I put much stock in much of anything that comes from Hulbert, my own DD indicates rates do have an effect.

      I won't bother discussing why, unless you want to.

      Delete
  10. Birinyi says we’re heading to S&P 2000

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/birinyi-says-were-heading-to-sp-2000-2013-09-13?pagenumber=1

    Makes a lot of sense to me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks that way, if you believe the IH&S plays out.

      Delete
  11. FLR & NuScale Power are building the scalable small nuclear reactors together, apparently. With backing from Rolls Royce as well.

    ReplyDelete
  12. My only comment this morning is, 'Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beyond this point there be OGRes.

      Delete
    2. I guess if you are a breakout style trader, you would like today's action, but I really don't think there are many of those left anymore.

      Seems that we will make a new high in the SPY over the next few weeks, but not sure how you trade that and get out before the next market drop.

      Delete
    3. I agree.
      The problem is breakouts tend to fail and the breakout is on top of a V shaped recovery that takes a lot of capital to keep going.
      It would take a pretty good push into new highs and a decent pullback to get me interested, but even then it would be a chancy entry.

      Delete
    4. Yeah, I'm sorry but I have huge difficulty with trusting breakouts. My other problem is trusting breakdowns will reverse, so place me on the next to clueless list where I belong.

      Delete
  13. CP, probably shouldn't have said Obama dislikes Yellen. He wanted Summers and he seemed to be one of the few and most others seem to want Yellen, so it was probably more of a Obama wanting his guy than specifically disliking Yellen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "He wanted Summers and he seemed to be one of the few "

      Dang, WTF is wrong with that man, I'm real surprised to hear this...... Summers is pro-TBTF, so WTF! :(

      Delete
  14. Shades of AUMN - Anglo American is walking away from Northern Dynasty's (NAK) Pebble Beach project after investing $500 million. Pebble is supposed to be the richest undeveloped copper/gold deposit in the world, but it's in an environmentally sensitive part of Alaska, so tough to develop. AUMN has a huge silver deposit, but hard to develop for them due to low grade.

    This is tough for NAK shareholders (stock down 30%), but it's what we need to see to get excess supply out of the mining market so we can get a sustainable bottom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're hitting on at least 6 of 8 concerning PM's, and more, so I take notice.

      Delete
  15. My ears just popped, are you guys thinking of shorting today's enthusiasm or is it too late?

    ReplyDelete
  16. A few hundy trading the bounce in GDX. Enough to justify my existence as a trader.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Enough to justify my existence as a trader."

      This is my problem when there is no trend.

      Delete
  17. Not shorting, but sold that CCL (carnival cruises that I bought back in April for $33.30 when they were getting all the bad PR. Getting things going seems to be taking longer and stock really isn't that cheap, even on next year's earnings. Made over 10%, so can't complain and raises cash for other opps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think they're tipping over that boat today.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I knew they were close - can't remember how much of that they are paying for versus the insurance company, but a lot of things could go wrong with that too I'd imagine.

      Delete
    3. Just as they're righting the ship and should be smooth sailing going forward, no better reason than that to sell.

      Delete
  18. Summers' withdrawal seems to have hit a nerve with NYer's considering they're already down here gunning down civil servants.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Had to do what I always do in situations like this..Transferred more cashola into the brokerage account. So there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Umm, I thought the plan was to transfer cashola in the other direction perpetually?

      I guess I must be missing out on some opportunity here.........?

      Delete
  20. I suppose that is good. But it is in some money market fund which could go bang. I prefer a credit union savings account. Not much return but then again I am not trading this year.

    ReplyDelete
  21. OUTR - Has this one hit the wall and didn't stick?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I still say that Carl Icahn should have sold all of his holdings in everything the day he went to Twitter. AAPL taking it on the chin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think AAPL is about to rally, it had a technical date with $450 and $447 was the support level that needed to hold. It's trading in a range, or so goes the chart theory.

      Delete
  23. BRKR - Also involved in the MANF analysis game.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Japan - Shut down it's last reactor yesterday, but some say it's a headfake and there have been 12 applying to restart.

    Then there's the modular reactors, which are quite similar to those the US uses to power nuclear ships....

    ReplyDelete
  25. URG - What do you guys think, worth a shot?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bombardier - Seadoo division announced a new low cost jetski model today, seems to be quite a bit of excitement over it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. After Summers comes Fall in front end rates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like he never really had a chance, to me:

      "Earlier this weekend, reports circulated that a fourth Democratic member of the
      Senate Banking Committee would not support Summers if nominated. This
      Committee would have to affirm any Fed nominee by a simple majority vote; there
      are 12 Democrats and 10 Republicans on the Committee."

      Delete
  28. This was put out by a fund company, so take it for what its worth (I always wonder when they get the grammar wrong in the first 10 sentences of an article!):

    "An study by several California and Chinese professors found that over a 15 year period only about 1% of traders are consistently profitable. Note that doesn’t mean they beat the market; it just means they actually made money."

    http://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=3734d874e292a28b94fc7f1ef&id=909cc7f9ed&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    Interesting article though on your competition as a short term trader these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also shows the strong group of traders on this site too!

      Delete
    2. I believe that studies show 90% lose their butts rather quickly.

      Delete
  29. GGN - I see this chart's IH&S and can't help wonder if PM's are about to take off for the moon.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 'several California and Chinese professors'... that's just a couple of dudes at a bar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, but were they drawing on paper napkins?

      Delete
    2. Haha - probably and just asking the other guys in the bar if they've made any money on stocks.

      Delete
  31. ARO - Taking half off here, preserving the 20% gain.

    Okay, so now's there's a fresh infusion of disposable income, what's Mark buying today?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My hands are tied. I'm trying to find something TOF likes that I do too.

      Delete
    2. I'm busily tarring and feathering myself this morning.

      Delete
  32. JPM - 10yr rate will move up, to between 3.5 and 4% I didn't catch the time horizon, LOL....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wouldn't surprise me if it was quite soon, maybe even before year end. Now that QE is probably ending and the economy is improving and the bond bull is likely over, we should get bounce pretty quickly to a more "normal" level.

      I'd consider the last 2 years of bond pricing a mo-mo top where people took bond prices far above where they should have been and now we are seeing the downside of that.

      Take a look at long term charts to see how out of place the last 2 years of bond pricing has been.

      Delete
    2. I don't disagree, I'm not qualified to. Seems to me though, there's been quite a bit of buying at 3% though, and the commercials have been loading up, whoever they are:

      http://www.finviz.com/futures_charts.ashx?t=ZN&p=d1

      Delete
  33. In the 'seriously?' category... Kendra get's her second start in today's BB game. And Dad didn't think she's make the team!

    ReplyDelete
  34. JO - This is the knockout move today, right?

    ReplyDelete
  35. AA - Looks like it wants to move up almost, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Been thinking about AA. Fundamentally, I think it makes some sense as they are a reasonable cost producer, are building a lowest-cost plant in the middle east, expensive China aluminum seems to be cutting back, and demand should be increasing with the high auto and airplane sales.

      But, on the other hand, it is Alcoa...

      Delete
    2. Could be, I just have this idea in my head that China has been acquiring and begun exploiting natural resource reserves in Mongolia, for some reason.

      Delete
  36. DOO.TO - The new affordable jet ski is priced around $5k, considerably less than previous BOAT-sized jetskis, is around 90hp and I think will be a hot selling four stroke jetski.

    Order yours today!

    ReplyDelete
  37. All the Fast Money lunch guys seem pretty positive on the markets post tomorrow's fed meeting.

    Will be a "buy the news event".
    "May be be a short, fast pullback on the initial read, but people will see as positive and buy that"

    Makes me wonder if the buying the last week into this wasn't the "buy the rumour" period.

    Having said that, they did call the AAPL pullback correctly last week.

    ReplyDelete
  38. GMO - Really flies when Mark's buying all day!

    ReplyDelete
  39. CP- This is Wo, my 4th grader. She's a proud member of the 10% club... bottom 10% in height and weight. But she can kick Kendra's butt!!

    ReplyDelete
  40. -2.45%...That's my total port return over the last 3 months. Crikes....It's felt like -22.45%!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least it was for a good cause, and you could make that up in just one day!

      Delete
  41. SDS - Sitting right at 52wk low again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It should. I just checked UKK which I bought 'near' the lows. It's up 540% right now. Not much decay there either.

      Delete
    2. I don't recall you buying that one, LOL!

      Delete
  42. @RyanDetrick take a peak at a 10yr chart of listings on NYSE (number of companies) it's down significantly. Lots of $ chasing fewer shares

    Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would help explain the newest highs, I guess. So did they go BK or private?

      Delete
    2. I don't know, but my $'s would be the bulk went BK or were absorbed.

      Delete
  43. ALDW - Wonder when the selling stops....

    ReplyDelete
  44. hey guys i know you were worried about me i just wanted to check in from colorado and say everything is ok so far. can't post from the road but good luck today on taper day.

    ReplyDelete
  45. 13G Filing from Deerfield's James Flynn Shows 7.16% Stake in NSPH.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That ought to help, wish I understood the difference between gold spheres and plastic ones, but I'd tend to believe gold has specific optical properties.

      Delete
  46. AUMN- I know they're part of a 10B5-1, but sheesh...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SEEMS to be going the way of APEX Dunno what's an 10B5-1 but doesn't sound good.

      Delete
  47. Well at least I get a good laugh this AM....

    The Bull and the Tootsie Roll
    "The Ps had a decent day, gaining nearly ½%. This action has them just shy of all-time highs. This, as Martha would say, is a good thing. Net net though, the index really hasn't made much forward progress in over 4 months. Plot the Ps and notice that they are just slightly above their May peak.

    Ideally, you know me, I'd like to see them blast higher and not look back for a while. This would negate the potential top(s) and other things that I have been concerned about such as the "V" shaped recovery at high levels.

    The Quack is a different story. It gained 3/4%. This action has it closing at multi-year highs. So far, its minor breakout remains intact.

    Internally, things are a little mixed. Many areas, like the Ps, have formed "V" shaped recoveries. This doesn't mean that they can't continue higher, it just suggests that they are already overbought.

    As you would imagine based on the Quack's performance, there are selected technology areas such as the Semis and Biotech that are making new highs/closing highs.

    I suppose the elephant in the room is the Fed. I think I liked the old secretive Fed much better. The one where you would find out in a report what they did 6-months ago. I am a chart dude, so I don't want to digress too far. With that said, I think the Fed has painted themselves into a corner with the free and easy money. Now they have to figure out a way to back off without upsetting the financial markets-to avoid the proverbial "Tootsie Roll" in the punch bowl. Good luck with that.

    When the market is in a rip roaring bull market you just go after most anything that's trending. Life is easy. Unfortunately, we are not in that type of market now. You have to choose your spots carefully. Take things on a setup-by-setup basis. At this juncture, I prefer stocks that can trade contra to the overall market and/or those that appear to be in developing trends vs. mature ones. With that said, I'm still seeing some setups in selected Industrial Metals.

    Once again, I would be leery of stocks that are in extended trends. This sort of goes against my trend following mantra. My concern with these stocks is that if the market doesn't follow through, the bigger they are, the harder they could fall. And if the market does follow through, they could become a source of funds. Now, if we get into a rip roaring bull market, then bring 'em on-the stronger the better.

    So what do we do? Again, continue to take things on a setup-by-setup basis. If you really like a setup, then take it. Just make sure you wait for entries. As I preach, that, in and of itself, can often keep you out of trouble. Markets are like life, it's a good idea to stay out of as much trouble as possible.

    Futures are flat pre-market."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonder how regional banks come out? Considering Yellen is more of a peoples and end of Summers is a blow to TBTF

      Delete
    2. Invariably these things never turn out like we suspect, right? If it's Yellen then it "may" be more dovish but rates have to rise and sooner or later we get a turd in the ol' punch bowl.
      I bet it's a Christmas gift.

      Delete
    3. Just think how quickly the party ends when that turd floats to the top if there's one in there, while everyone runs for the bathroom puking and gagging.

      Delete
  48. 1707 is the gap fill, 1705.5 is the resistance to get us there.

    ReplyDelete
  49. GLD, GDX and GDXJ all seem to have failed to take the June highs and heading down again. Plus with the US Government seeming to get their budgets back under control and the Fed tapering, seems like it was just a technical bounce.

    Plus, I was golfing yesterday with one of my gold bug friends and he just couldn't believe that stocks were going up and gold was going down - he was sure the pullback last month was the beginning of a crash into the fall. All good signs that the bull market in stocks and the bear in gold continues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, PM's actually bounced a bit higher that I expected. Recall the last debt limit increase reaction though, not likely to repeat again, is it? I have doubts concerning a repeat due to the point you made, and Summers was an advocate of infrastructure spending, which would have perhaps added to debt but that aspect becomes too murky for me to think through.

      I don't quite understand how the debt is decreasing when it seems like spending is up and receipts haven't recovered fully, except perhaps due to the FED's enhanced level of monetization which if balanced correctly(seems to be) simply would offset disinflation.

      Delete
    2. Remember the increased payroll taxes at the start of the year. Plus the decrease in military spending and other things from the year end budget stuff.

      Delete
    3. Yes, actually that does make sense, considering the withdrawals from middle east spending must've gone down. And true on the payroll tax increase as well.

      I guess I was looking at the military contractor pps's thinking they would've taken big hits....

      Delete
  50. Okay, SVM resistance here needs to hold $3.20

    ReplyDelete
  51. Might be a good opportunity to get long, wish I had some clue....

    ReplyDelete
  52. Reps move to block healthcare act, risk gov shutdown.

    ReplyDelete