Tuesday, December 24, 2013

12/24/13 The Ebb Tide

http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc131216.htm I make it a point to read John Hussman's weekly comments. He's been 'wrong' for quite some time, warning of a correction that he estimates will be in the -50% range. However, he was wildly bullish in the early Nineties, correctly warned about market excesses in 2000, 'right' to become bullish again in 2003, and 'right' in becoming defensive in 2007. His research appears to be solid, and he attributes his recent 'miss' of the 2010-13 rally to insisting (following the 2008-9 Crash) that his methodology be 'tightened' to include Depression-era data. You can read his explanations in detail in the archived commentary. I'm linking the above article mainly because I believe solid managers have a right to an occasional 'miss,' and because I believe he will soon be proven 'right' in his call for a severe correction. There aren't many asset classes that are not overvalued at this point, IMO> stocks, bonds, and real estate are all richly priced. Stocks (in the US, at least) have had a good run (+173% for the SPX since 2009). 2013 was the beginning of the end for the 30-year bull market in bonds (ie, a reversal in interest rates is inevitable). And with rising mortgage rates, real estate prices will begin to moderate. All of the above is 'normal.' The markets are cyclical, reflecting the underlying cyclical nature of the investors who determine the pricing of assets. I would encourage you to read a few of Hussman's articles, and be prepared to sit out the next Bear to the extent possible. I'm guessing all of your portfolios are near multi-year highs, having achieved outsized gains the past 5 years. Don't let the ebb tide take it back.

129 comments:

  1. Every coin has at least two sides!

    Depression era - And so, what happened once the mistakes leading to the depression era were understood? The dynamics are slightly improved now(as a result of lessons learned?), the FED exists and they have an envious array of tools at their disposal, not the least of which is the ability to capitalize on flight to safety.

    Does Hussman disbelieve indicators suggesting economic growth is gaining a foothold?

    "with rising mortgage rates, real estate prices will begin to moderate."

    Not sure what you're reading into this, moderation could simply mean we should not anticipate real estate prices might rise in an increasingly robust (ie: parabolic) manner? There were regions where a real estate crash didn't happen simply because builders were fulfilling market demand previous to the financial crisis(housing prices were kept in check) and funny enough, one of those regions was where housing crashed during the S&L crisis. Perhaps that particular region learned a valuable lesson and implemented checks and balances, or just got lucky this time?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More importantly (assuming I was reading Hussman), I would be interested in his demeanor, does he take an attitude that he doesn't have to objectively examine both(or more) sides of his argument to his readers?

      Delete
    2. I think part of hussmans problem is he's not flexible in his thinking. The other part is he shouldn't try to pedict the future direction of the market. Stick to asset classes within which are far more predictable and easy to understand

      Delete
  2. Everyone have a lovely evening tonight and a Merry Christmas tomorrow! For your 2014 resolution, consider something we can all do to help our wonderful planet... Go Solar!!!... and pls. chose ENPH micro-inverters. The best inverters 5 years running!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's quite an endorsement on behalf of Enphase, Mark. What are your thoughts on the SA article declaring "Alarming Warranty Obligation Growth", is it possible the operative words are "Alarming & Growth"?

      Delete
    2. My take is the piece is biased at best. Alrighty fellas have a good Christmas!

      Delete
  3. Alright. Half-time's over. Back on the field.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CP- I think if you read both of the SA articles and comments you might come up with a better understanding of the issue than I have. My take is based on people who work there and what the installers I use say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Insiders know what the failure rate is, they get the performance data in real-time.:

      "For those of you who don't know much about this software it collects data via the AC and transmits it via a gateway at the installation location's internet connection to Enphase. Enphase then lets the customer access his own installation's data via his internet browser using a password system for security. I can review my output for each panel in real time, and see hourly, daily and monthly performance figures in raw numbers and via a series of other comprehensive graphs and reports. A really well done system for monitoring both performance and reliability. "

      Delete
  5. NWLI - Testing the double top, will the third time be the charm?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like a new 52wk high, best I can tell (quotes are funky on my screen for some reason).

      Delete
  6. So, now I hold the following, and looking for something to add:
    BALT
    NWLI
    BSBR - 1/4 position
    NLY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could always smoke a REFR or buy some GuNK.

      Delete
    2. GNK - The thought crosses my mind often! :)
      CXO - I like this one too, or maybe DVN? The reason is, the Permian will be larger than the Bakken. Already the dirtball wooden shacks(literally) in Midland are renting for $1000/month, up from $100.

      Delete
    3. And, I really feel I need an oil play since I got shaken out of oil under $40..........

      Delete
  7. Hussman back below IPO price of $10.00 in 2000 today. Had some good dividends in there, but still, no capital appreciation in 12 years.

    The danger in reading a guy like Hussman is he can drag you down and stop you from making good investments. I think you want to be open-minded in what you read, but also careful not to get too many negative as you need to maintain a somewhat optimistic outlook in investing.

    Morningstar gives it a 1-star of 5 (negative) and says:

    Hussman Strategic Growth's hedging process is too costly.

    Since 2008, this fund has miserably failed to meet its investment objectives, which are to achieve long-term capital appreciation with an emphasis on downside protection. Whereas the S&P 500 has returned 16% annualized (through June 2013), this fund has managed to lose almost 3% annualized, thanks primarily to the fund's broken hedging strategy.

    Portfolio manager John Hussman's investment process selects approximately 100 U.S. large-cap stocks according to a fundamental, bottom-up quantitative process, and then a macroeconomic quantitative process determines how much of the portfolio to hedge with index options. Per his investor letters, Hussman has hedged most of the portfolio since its 2000 inception because of his bearish outlook (for example, as of March 2013, Hussman stated that S&P 500 will return only 3.6% over the next 10 years). This perma-bear position worked for him in the 2000-02 downturn and during the 2008 financial crisis, but since then his hedges have done much more harm than good. In 2010, for example, the fund's long equity portfolio outpaced the S&P 500 (16.6%, respectively, compared with 16.0% for the index). But net of hedges, the portfolio lost 3.6%, squarely violating the fund's mandate of protecting investor's capital. Hussman blames the hedging model's dismal performance on his intervention in early 2009. But the newer models seem to be no less-biased toward Hussman's extremely bearish sentiment, and recent performance results aren't exactly reassuring.

    In 2012, for example, the fund lost 12.6%, even worse than its 2008 showing. Its equity positions lagged the S&P 500 by an astounding 7.0% last year, owing the balance of the losses (more than 28%) to the fund's hedges. Whereas Hussman typically shines at stock-picking (in 2009 the equity portfolio beat the S&P 500 Index by 13.9%), in 2012 poor stock-picking and an underweighting to financials stocks turned against him. It is true that the fund only costs 1.05%, but at this point, cheaper is no longer better.

    ReplyDelete
  8. NWLI - Can you believe someone sold shares of this one at $206 just days ago? Can't imagine what kind of article would provoke them to do that, perhaps one penned by a Phd that goes by the name of Hussman?

    ReplyDelete
  9. F - An aluminum truck, eh? I like it, AA likes it too!

    ReplyDelete
  10. (a) TLT continues to sell off today (taking losses immediately on Tuesday paid off), and trading at the lows of the year.
    (b) EEM selling off. Bad news out of China last night re bad loan percentage rates.
    (c) GDX initially spiked, then sold off, and now flat.
    (d) US indexes are spiking to new highs.

    Risk level is high IMO, and competitive instincts aside, a +7.6% return for the year is quite reasonable. (On a risk-adjusted basis, I’m pretty certain the +7.6% might even be extraordinary.) I may have to wait 'til 2014 for another play.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone has to trade their own way. Risk/reward/timeframes are different for everyone.

      I'm pretty sure you are outperforming most hedge funds this year too.

      Delete
    2. "Bad news out of China last night re bad loan percentage rates."

      This "overused" story used to have an impact, doesn't seem to, anymore?

      Delete
    3. ie: I think I finally left my behind in the past.

      Delete
  11. 12/23/13 - Most commodities are headed for sluggish price action in 2014 due to weak global demand, Citigroup's Ed Morse said Monday.

    "The period of high prices led to an incredible—in fact, a record—amount of investment on the supply side," he said. "So, we're having significantly more supply across most commodities, and demand is not rising at the rate it was."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mark leaves a trail wherever he goes:

    "Vegas cabbie turns in $300,000 found in back seat "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't have gone back for a measly 300k, bro. 10 or 20 mil, sure.

      Delete
    2. Yes, it's not the money, it's the fun that can be had with it in smokey back room parlors!

      Delete
  13. A little gold porn:

    http://usawatchdog.com/what-happens-when-you-have-to-admit-the-golds-not-there-eric-sprott/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I take that back. Gold will crater if this is true, b/c it will be interpreted as central banks have assigned zero value?

      Delete
  14. http://articles.elitefts.com/training-articles/the-adversity-quotient-and-the-tree-of-success/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think many people are the products of their environments, not a hard and fast rule though.

      Delete
  15. "There's no training...that can prepare for trading the last 3rd of a move, whether it's the end of a bull or bear market" -Paul Tudor Jones

    Wow, tell me about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All you had to do was sell in the spring of 2008 and buy back near the end of the year - all the technicians will tell you how obvious the charts were. After the fact.

      Delete
  16. Interesting, so if the euro is near done on the upside and Yen has further downside to go, considering it appears the US economy is one of the shining stars, then shouldn't the $US be moving up?

    Don't ya love my simple logic?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Another of those stories which shows why you can't listen to analyst ratings:

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sorry-haters-unloved-stocks-had-a-great-year-2013-12-26

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They hated NFLX, I kinda thought that internet movie streaming sounded like a good idea, 2nd was doing it all year.

      Delete
  18. Man, a TON of talk about the shippers on line now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Must not be good, judging by the 4% plunge in BALT

      Delete
    2. Things are getting a bit too excited in the shipper I'd say. If I look at the chart for NM, it has been in a well-defined upwarding sloping channel for the last year, but just broke out in the last couple of days.

      Maybe it is an upside breakout and we take off from here, but more likely a lot of energy was used getting out of the channel and we correct. The problem with stocks like these is risk is so high - if you sell, you may never get back in. If you hold, you may take a big hit. Probably best to do a partial sell, but I have not done anything yet.

      Delete
    3. Good assessment, I guess it depends on oversupply of ships becoming a continuing theme.

      Delete
  19. MCP - Today it's MCP's turn, apparently.

    ReplyDelete
  20. One full hour of nonsense remaining to endure.......

    ReplyDelete
  21. There's your double for PEIX. I honestly don't think I'm capable of trading right now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crazy man. I don't know many people that could have held through that. I bought at $3.7 and probably sold at $3.5 or so. No way I would have held through $2.3 and back.

      Delete
    2. $2.30 was the obligatory knockout.

      Delete
  22. Lots of dogs lifting today...PEIX, cols, a select few shippers, some China small cap stocks (KNDI, VISN, eg), and aluminum stocks. Unfortunately, I'm only holding one of those winners today (GNK).

    I stand by my belief that the baltic dry index is going to be far more stable and sustainable going forward due to skittishness on the part of shippers and banks for a while. I think GNK has a chance to extend its debt maturities and show its ability to pay off its debt over time. So I think it can survive and ultimately reward shareholders.

    More importantly in my opinion is I think this will also remove any skepticism about BALT which, while it doesn't have any liability associated with GNK because they are separate entities, it shares management with GNK and this association is in my opinion is holding it back some. I think there's a chance that they extend their debt and if that happens I think you could see GNK up huge and BALT up a lot as this cloud is lifted. We'll see. If there's a default then the reverse may happen in the very short term.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Up on bad news would be the best scenario I could imagine.

      Delete
    2. How do you see this playing out if GNK does go BK? I have to admit, I am a little scared by how interconnected the two Co's. are.

      Delete
    3. My fear is, the associating between companies may have been arranged to offload dead assets into BALT. Or, it could have been a vehicle to move good assets out of GNK?

      Who knows, but it's got me wondering as well, why they started up BALT aside from the desire to line some pockets but who's pockets and when?

      Delete
    4. Yeah, kinda a good bank, bad bank thing. Hmmm... I wonder how well regulated all of this is. Probably not well.

      Delete
  23. You can buy my house now with only 150K down and 30 years @ just 3,500/month.

    ReplyDelete
  24. My two girls are in a photo shoot today for a website. For some reason we aren't allowed to mention the site but you all would know it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. PEIX - This chart looks like it's got $6.50 in it to me, based on neckline breakout of h&S.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oh hell, I thought today was Thursday, no wonder there's some profit taking going into the weekend.

    BALT needs to close better than $6.28, if Monday is weak then it's probably going to take an upside refreshment holiday for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Fridays can be great days to short PM's too, due to the destruction that seems to occur in thin volume just prior to Monday open.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Mark - I'm not really sure how it plays out. I know they wanted to create a pure play entity that would only be tethered to spot rates and not locked into longer term contracts. That was the goal of BALT originally and that's why I think it offers the most upside should rates steadily rise over time. I think they were thinking that rates were not going to go any lower than they were in 2009 so they spun them off, hoping to capture major upside when the sector rebounded and rates went higher. I think they clearly didn't expect it to stay low for as long as it did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What exactly did they 'spin off'? I'm trying to understand how this all happened.

      Delete
    2. "We are a newly formed New York City-based company incorporated in October 2009 in the Marshall Islands to conduct a shipping business focused on the drybulk industry spot market. We were formed by Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK), a leading international drybulk shipping company that will also serve as our Manager. We intend to leverage the expertise and reputation of Genco to pursue growth opportunities in the drybulk shipping spot market. To pursue these opportunities, we plan to acquire and operate a fleet of drybulk ships that will transport iron ore, coal, grain, steel products and other drybulk cargoes along worldwide shipping routes. We anticipate that our initial fleet will consist of four Supramax vessels and two Capesize vessels. We plan to operate all of our vessels in the spot market, on spot market-related time charters, or in vessel pools trading in the spot market."

      Delete
    3. "Net proceeds of approximately $284 million (from offering and capital contribution by Genco) will be used to acquire six vessels."

      Delete
  29. TBF/TBT - Seem to have broken out to the upside?

    ReplyDelete
  30. If the German 5yr rate were to increase (dramatically?), would that translate into a flattening curve for Germany or Europe and what are the potential repercussions, recessionary or where is the capital going to flow?

    http://peterlbrandt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/12.26_EBM_weekly.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mark - Here's a good overview of what GNK was probably looking at in 2009:
    http://www.thestreet.com/story/10699909/1/baltic-trading-ipo-disappoints.html

    Sounds like they probably thought rates were going to increase and wanted to take advantage of it somehow given they probably were having a tough time raising $$ with GNK in a tight spot. I used to see this all the time with the hedge funds I worked on...they had a poorly performing hedge fund and wanted to raise capital at what they thought were the lows to show better returns and attract more $$.

    ReplyDelete
  32. DRYS - Over $4 now, has to be a good indicator, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I've been doing some thinking about the base metal stocks and think they may be ready to go in 2014.

    The economy is improving and there are conflicting reports about how much actual metal supply is coming onstream, some saying a lot, others saying not so much. Demand should increase as countries continue to grow their middle classes. Its a related bet to the shippers and Alcoa as the same demand dynamics apply, but the supply fundamentals are different.

    if you look at the long charts for well run miners like RIO, they did well even with weak commodity prices in the 1990's, so should do well if prices hang in here or possibly go up. Copper over $3.00 is still quite good.

    I'm pretty sure I'm going to buy one, probably Lundin (LUN.TO) as they have a good balance sheet, good management and a diversified portfolio, but I'm still deciding where I want to be on the risk curve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BB - I think you're right and it's one of the major reasons why I've liked the shippers. I think 2nd is right that emerging markets are the play and those are the ones that consume the most of the stuff that shippers ship. I think there's a chance the EMs do very well and if that happens I think some of these shippers go up 300 to 500%.

      Best Scenario:
      BALT trades up to $20 to $30 this year.
      GNK goes to $15.
      NM goes to $20 to $25.

      Delete
  34. This is really good and goes a long way in explaining why I'm not a great trader.

    http://stocktwits50.com/2013/09/22/stanley-druckenmiller-greatest-moneymaking-machine-history/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for posting, Mark. Best freaking article I've read in a long time.

      Delete
  35. I've never seen this screen before. Pretty cool.

    http://finviz.com/bubbles/bubbles.ashx?t=etf&st=p1y

    ReplyDelete
  36. Jesse sent out a GLOBALREPORT.PDF in addition to MONSTERS.PDF but I couldn't open the two PDF files, perhaps my PDF reader is too old?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I'm afraid to upgrade anything b/c last time I did that I was forced to buy a new computer. Apparently some of the new s/w was incompatible with my older unstable MSFT operating system.

      Delete
  37. AXL - Only has doubled off the 52wk low.

    ReplyDelete
  38. http://www.kitco.com/charts/livesilver.html

    It will likely reverse within the next few minutes. If not, certainly by Monday morning. If not, then I'm buying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hopefully way beyond that if it continues all night.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, it probably oscillates within $1 of $20 for the next three years before the sub $13 plunge comes.

      Delete
    3. $20 is interesting level back 10 years.

      Delete
  39. CP- I'll summarize the global report> get into BRICs (EWZ, RSX, EPI/SCIF, FXI), Beyond Brics (BBRC, IDX, THD), and the building bricks (copper, coal, oil, steel) of the world's infrastructures.

    ReplyDelete
  40. DBC - Good God Thursday & Fri, bad data?

    ReplyDelete
  41. BSBR - Stink bid @ $5.90, trying to increase my 1/4 position to 1/2, then will add more between $5.60~$5.80 if it gets there.

    ReplyDelete
  42. $BALT - $6.86 established a parallel channel, shoulda' seen that coming! :)

    ReplyDelete
  43. If your a flag player, PACB is your play baby!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd like the flag even better if it was putting in a series of lower lows.

      Delete
  44. Sold GNK at 2.43 and enph at 6.14. Rolled some into balt at 6.13

    ReplyDelete
  45. SLW off @ 20.23. EWZ off @ 40.46. Not feelin' it this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  46. BALT - See that flag was a bear flag b/c it consisted of higher lows, another day of this and I'm going to feel compelled to add. Plenty of other ugliness out there today(including CXO), hope this doesn't carry into 2014!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Balt took delivery of two ships today:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/baltic-trading-limited-completes-acquisition-of-two-capesize-vessels-2013-12-30?reflink=MW_news_stmp

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rates are approximately 45% higher than last qtrs avg. spot rates are about 75% higher. With the expanded fleet they should have 50% higher capacity in q1 than last qtr. do the math on 1.75 x 1.5. More ships coming on board in q2 2014.

      Delete
    2. Which is why I won't mind adding into nonsense.

      Delete
  48. I really wanted to buy miners into the close. The invisible hand stopped me. Maybe tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  49. RevShark's stock of the week: FTEK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hit the after hours ask of 7.68 for 700 shares. If you know me, you'll know I'm big on (a) sanitation, (b) reducing pollution, and (c) anything else that helps clean up the sidewalks.

      Delete
    2. Looks just like the FMD H&S chart the day prior to the earnings report, when they admitted trying to cheat the IRS.

      Delete
    3. We've watched this one in the past. Is there a catalyst?

      Delete
    4. Date: 12.30.13
      Time: 07:23AM

      China is Key to This Pollution Play

      Our Stock of the Week is Fuel Tech, Inc. (FTEK). FTEK sells combustion optimization and emission control technologies primarily to utilities and industrial clients. It has over 800 combustion units installed which help to reduce nitrogen oxide and sulfur trioxide emissions.

      The company produced a big earnings beat on November 11, which drove the stock from $4.75 to over $9.50. It has now pulled back and is consolidating that huge run.

      The company has a big project in Chile which is driving current earnings and should help to produce another big quarter. However it needs more contract wins to keep the momentum going. Valuation is aggressive but business can grow quickly if its efforts in China start to pay off.

      Technically the stock is pulling back to support around the $7 to $7.50 level. We are looking to slowly average in as it holds support or to chase should volume pick up and strength build. As always we would not chase a gap up on Monday morning.



      Delete
    5. btw, all you need to do is register your email for free access to his weekly stock picks.

      Delete
  50. And of course, PM's regain some (but not all) composure in AH.......

    ENPH - Hey, this one closed green!

    ReplyDelete
  51. I take it the markets will close early on Tuesday?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shutterstock
      Some investors and traders will welcome in the new year with an abbreviated trading session on Tuesday, Dec. 31. Others will have to tough it out to the end of the normal trading day before uncorking the champagne.

      Stocks, including the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, will close at their regular time of 4 p.m. Eastern.

      The bond market will observe a 2 p.m. recommended close from Sifma, though there is no official market close.

      Oil and gold will both settle at their normal times: 1:30 p.m. for gold, and 2:30 p.m. for oil, according to NYMEX.

      Currencies don’t observe a closing time, but CME foreign-exchange and interest-rate futures will settle at 1 p.m.

      London stock markets will close at 12:30 p.m. local time. Germany’s DAX is closed all day Tuesday. About half of European stock markets will be open for a partial day Tuesday.

      In Asia, Monday is the last full day of trade for many markets. The Nikkei is closed for the year, and Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore all close early.

      Delete
    2. We go through this every year and I still always think tomorrow is a short day.

      Delete
    3. I'm in the same boat as mark. Thought it was 1/2 day

      Delete
  52. A little long term perspective

    http://schaefferstradingfloor.com/could-this-bull-market-have-another-20-years-left/id=7555

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hopefully it doesn't take 20yrs for my portfolio to perform, LOL!

      Delete
  53. I know it's probably naive but I don't hear a lot of people in every day life that are all in stocks or super bullish. Most people question the markets rise or don't even understand how the market could be up if the "economy is so bad". Then if you read comments on bullish blog posts or see the univ of mich sentiment reports they too suggest not a lot of people r bullish. People in the market might be but I still think the majority of slow money / retail investors are cautious. Doesn't mean we won't get 10 or even 20% pullbacks but I think over next 5 to 10 years we are a lot higher

    ReplyDelete
  54. Cp I keep looking at that DBC chart you mentioned and it seems incredibly bullish to me. Think about what those two daily bars mean. Both days the price was pummeled down only to be rejected violently back up to the upside. There's major support right there. I would think that this is an excellent spot to put a heavy long position on as it's a low risk trade. I think the bigger picture is in thinking what this means for sectors tied into the DBC trade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hl?s=DBC+Holdings

      Delete