There's a quote (apocryphal, perhaps) attributed to Dizzy Gillespie that reads, 'When I hear the door creak, my fingers immediately position themselves [on the trumpet] on the flat five [an interval higher or lower on the scale].' The 'flat five' is the signature 'sound' of the bebop era.
It's analogous to the reaction that John Templeton refers to when he says, 'Buy when there's blood in the streets.'
Trading and music are similar in many ways. One I have yet to come across is what might be called 'harmonic dissonance.' Depress a D-flat key on the piano, followed by its flatted fifth, G (aka a flatted A-flat). A dissonant sound for most listeners. However, what happens when you add a C, B-flat, and E underneath? It then becomes a C7flat5flat9, the driving sound behind most blues. Note also that a Db7flat5 voicing is exactly the same as that for G7flat5, the so-called tritone relationship (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritone).
Who cares, really? Investors should care. When playing in the key of D-flat major, it's redundant to voice D-flat or A-flat in the upper register. That's because a bass player has the notes 'covered.' Instead, you want to 'color' the chord by playing the third, ninth, or major seventh. Similary, when you read the 'news,' typically the correct trade is to 'fade' the news, or to at least fade the reflexive reaction by most investors to the news. That's how a trader structures a winning trade.
If markets only worked that predictably. They don't. Still, the odds favor fading the majority. There's a good chance that buying Russia, Brazil or China this morning will pay off down the road.
Added a position in RYWVX at the close.
ReplyDeleteCP- If you print a comment at 444 pm, it's dead. The hotel where we roomed in Vancouver catered to Chinese guests. There was no 4th floor.
ReplyDeleteClose call 2nd, I once had a cat named Four, for 4 on the floor! Well almost, he was quickly renamed Thomasina, the cat who thought he was God..
ReplyDeleteOkay so pick a solar stock that closed green today.... I nominate NRG!
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Tech-CEO-on-bike-arrested-in-Marin-road-rage-5429625.php
ReplyDeleteWow, way to ---- up your life.
Smart guy.
DeleteVVUS - Okay, how about this one?
ReplyDeleteWhy do you like it?
DeleteJust b/c it looks like it's low risk and ready to recover some, gap down needs to close, looking bullish. :)
DeleteGALE is another similar
Is it a biotech with no earnings?
DeleteLet me know if Russia backs down, or China announces additional easing measures.
ReplyDeleteHey Guys. Patricia had what hopefully was successful surgery. Looks good so far. Radiation treatment in a few months. I'm hope full but have my fingers crossed just in case.
ReplyDeleteAnd... GO SHARKS!!!
Good Luck to Patrica, Mark.
DeleteAre they going to use the inserted probe in a temporary bladder, or external bombardment? The later is becoming old tech. The reason I ask is b/c it's important the balloon is installed ASAP, months sounds like external treatment but if using the probe months will be too late to install the probe bladder.
DeleteAnd, did they use the nanoknife?
DeleteCP- The radiation is oral. I think they will do it 3 times. Somehow the cancer cells left absorb it. Not sure why it doesn't also kill everything else. Somehow she's supposed to be quarantined for a few days each time. Not quite sure how they pull that off though.
DeleteBest wishes, bro.
DeleteFucking cancer man
DeleteOral might be the treatment I suppose, jumping to conclusion, I was going on assumption we were discussing breast cancer not knowing detail.
DeleteAnd yes, we also went through the radioactive tracer thing including "quarantine" periods, but that wasn't treatment it was for MRI?
DeleteGallup saying average people like real estate best, gold second and then stocks - I'm honestly surprised gold still above stocks:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/168554/americans-sold-real-estate-best-long-term-investment.aspx
http://ibankcoin.com/news/2014/04/25/2007-2014-parallels/
ReplyDeleteSeems like they're trying to make the data fit their theory - no way the housing market in 2014 is like in 2007.
DeleteYeah could be although it's interesting that the selling season is soft so far. Would have expected the opposite with the gnarly winter much of the country had
DeleteNot quite sure what this means for the markets, but I suspect it will be viewed positively:
ReplyDeletehttp://blogs.marketwatch.com/themargin/2014/04/27/george-clooney-engaged-a-sign-of-the-apocalypse-brokenhearted-find-comfort-in-chocolate/?mod=MW_latest_news
Why I can't shake the feeling that if I go fully long again I will lose any gains I have in an instant. Very gun shy this year.
ReplyDeleteI basically don't have a ton of confidence in my ability to pick stocks that will weather the storm that could be coming. I feel like blue chips should be safe but part of me wonders whether this was all a big central bank induced bubble that pops even if I believe there was some fundamental support for this bull market.
DeleteWill there be any ports in the storm?
Deletehttps://swarm.tv/t/JXid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm2SuAPuA38
DeleteIt's possible, but I'm pretty sure we are just going through the standard mid-bull market rotation. Every market is different, but they do tend to follow certain patterns and this seems to be time when we switch from aggressive juniors to more stable, value oriented large caps.
DeleteThe reason I am attuned to this (and maybe reading things into it that I shouldn't) is I saw this in the Canadian market in 2006. Back then, the market moved to a large-cap focus (a lot of banks) and I missed the shift and underperformed the market that year. That and 2008 are the only years I underperformed the market since I started investing in 2000.
Back then, I was sure the market was rolling over as I saw many small stocks (miners back then) dropping off and so I did some shorting large US financials against my smaller stocks which had done so well and I missed the transition. Even the small caps I did keep underperformed against the larger stocks. I eventually figured it out, but it was a tricky time and seemed much more pronounced in Canada than the US as Canada was in a much stronger bull market in the 2000's.
So, maybe we don't get this rotation this time, but I am looking for it and have been positioning my portfolio for it as you can probably tell by some of my latest stock purchases.
Yeah it's a good point. I am definitely leaning toward big caps. If we do get a big pullback my suspicion is we get one without much of a bounce. I think a lot of people will be buying dips and most are looking for a 10-15% max pullback
DeleteKind of think ERY might work here. It's a contrarian call
ReplyDeleteI really like that idea, good thinking!.
Deletehttp://m.seekingalpha.com/article/2167603
ReplyDeleteSeasonal slogan time is here.
Five encouraging economic trends suggest (finally) escape velocity.
Most investors remain sidelined -- except the affluent.
There are some solid investment ideas that fit the climate.
Recession risk remains low.
PBR off premarket. Someone hit my 'ask' of 13.57. Ha!
ReplyDeleteRSX off @ 22.10.
ReplyDeleteEEM off @ 40.82.
ReplyDeleteOpening a small position in VALE @ 13.
VALE off @ 13.13.
DeleteNRG - Still green and greener, is this the new silicon technology or something else?
ReplyDeleteThis is what I'm referring to, it's a great idea if it works:
Deletehttp://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2013/10/15/technologies-secures-build-full-scale-silicon-wafer-factory/3EOxXdTlMBz0RS1dHsmZjN/story.html
Last week I was thinking we would ramp into 4/30 with a potential spike reversal day. Thursday / Friday made me question that, but it looks like its a real possibility now. Should be quite wild trading this week.
ReplyDeleteI bought SNE this morning at $17.84. I still think this gets repriced higher soon. I see no justification for its market cap, especially when a company like NOK trades at a 40% higher market cap.
RYWVX off at the 1030 am window. RSX calls off for a buck each. Back to 100% cash.
ReplyDeleteI don't know man. The Fed bubble sure looks like its bursting to me.
ReplyDeleteI cancelled my CSIQ $27.22 stink bid just before it plunged.
DeleteBailed on my SNE at $17.87, sold a little ENPH at $7.4, bought some SDS at $28.34.
ReplyDeleteCCJ - Now below the trend line here at $21.91, could be a decent entry for a run to $23? Am thinking about URG at $1.15 stink bid.
ReplyDeleteI dumped the rest of the ENPH at $7.25 to $7.3. Round tripper right there. I think I might have squeezed a few shekels out on the plus side but I've seen this before and waiting will only make it worse.
ReplyDeleteLook at CSIQ. Wow.
ReplyDeleteTypical bull trap but where too now, what's silicon doing, getting ready to plunge?
DeleteFLWS - Reports in la manyana prior to open...
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of the devil, dammit!
DeleteThere's definitely some really bearish trading going on right now. Look at LNKD dude. It was at $180 three days ago. NOW? $55 post earnings.
DeleteDRYS and shippers cratering.
Seems like some emerging market stuff is doing well, AAPL is doing well, GTIM (home of the custard pie) is doing well.
$55, holy F__K, batman!
DeleteOh I see LNKD is $147 I guess you meant under $155.. Ouch, good thing we only sniffed and didn't step in it.
DeleteTSLA - Okay so what happened, did Congress just repeal that appalling $10k tax credit you get for buying one of these electric hotrods or maybe Chris Christy has coned off the HOV commuter lanes again?
ReplyDeleteTUR - Nicely green, another repeat of action from a couple weeks ago or will this puppy roll over here too and give us another low BB style entry?
ReplyDeleteGSE's - A think a shutdown of the GSE's would amount to yanking the rug from under the housing industry?
I bought a little more DATE today at $5.65. I'm getting $3 a share in cash and with 15% bottom line growth next year the dividend yield will be 5% on current prices. Not bad value in my opinion for a company with significant growth opportunities ahead of it and a leading market share.
ReplyDeleteI'm keeping my eye on that RH gap down in the 30's!
ReplyDeleteYes, please do. Wow, this market isn't making friendly at all. :(
DeleteFLWS - Sure hope earnings are good, I'm flat now on this one with my basis of $5.45, My nuts is feeling mighty numb too....
ReplyDeleteNot many bulls out there? Why is the VIX at 14?
ReplyDeleteYou first! Take gains on the morning gap up!
DeleteIt's Monday night and things just got real for Mrs. Yellen:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bromygod.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/wtf-monday-bro-my-god-13.jpg
You know that photo is real b/c the pistol handle isn't horizontal.
DeleteLNKD going for the gap fill. Wow. Never really thought it could happen. I think I will have to begin to step in around $125.
ReplyDeleteLNKD - So the PE of this one is something around 300 years of profits, right?
ReplyDeletevs the PE of TM is about 9 years, I think.
DeleteYNDX - I guess diplomatic relations could worsen before becoming resolved but seriously, is Putin actually considering restricting internet freedom or just spying on the internet like our government does and as the internet was originally intended?
ReplyDeleteRe LNKD, I don't think it should be over $100. 12 times sales and 65 times earnings. I know people are expecting a lot of growth, but buying at these levels means you are paying for huge growth and you need super-huge growth (if that's a word) to get the stock higher. Any slip, increase in competition, downturn in prospects, etc. and the stock's expected growth drops and it could get crushed.
ReplyDeleteMy guess is stocks like LNKD, FB, TWTR, WDAY - all the stocks without reasonable fundamentals behind them, grind down all year with minor rallies along the way. They need to get cheap enough for investors, not traders to get into them and give them support for a real base. You can play these rallies, but easier money in other places in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteYou guys may not be aware of this, but Canadian market is up about 7% YTD and energy stocks are up 15%. Canadian market, due to it's high commodity content tends to do outperform the US as we get later into a bull market. I think broadly those are the types of stock we should be looking at now - AA, SU, CNQ. There are always special situations and individual stocks which make sense (like FLWS) as it is good to diversify, but top down, I'd be looking away from high-value tech/biotech and more into stocks like these.
ReplyDeleteBY the way, I am still holding half of my NM stock. My costs was around $3.40 and I sold half over $10.00, so it easier to watch the decline when your playing with free money (even though it isn't really), but I don't think shippers are done this cycle. My concern is the coal industry and how it affects demand on these guys, but NM is a broad shipper with dry goods, but also energy and a South American river division, so has a bit less risk.
ReplyDeleteBut it does feel like the hedgies are abandoning NM, which is good for the long term as they will be the source of future demand if fundamentals continue to improve.
Yeah my concern is also about the coal industry and about potential reduced demand from China both not being able to soak up the extra ships. Will be interesting to watch though.
DeleteMy understanding is China has become less dependent on coal imports but Europe has shuttered gas turbines in favor of less expensive coal from foreign sources. Also if I recall and there's any truth to it there's been stiff opposition to fracking for gas in Europe, maybe that mindset is changing?
DeleteThere are other solutions to this form of pollution and I'm here to say despite global warming my universe is basically a cold place a good percentage of the time and I don't particularly adore the concept of creating heat by mechanical friction.
Of course I have this hugely incorrect in a "The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde" sort of way, where the Hyde dynamic involves China's new ability to build, (finance?) and sell way too many ships thus "flooding" the market..
DeleteRE: LNKD - I think the argument could be made that they have basically a monopoly. That's what I hear from my recruiter friends. They have pricing power too.
ReplyDeleteOh yes, now I recall you mentioned that previously. Thanks for the recap.
DeletePicked up some TZA at $17.83
ReplyDeleteday trade...
Delete$17.8299 actually. WTF I want to know who's taking that $0.0001.
Alrighty then. Sold $17.7. Sold SDS at $28.38. What a move today
DeleteExactly! And I want to know why I can't get in on such a sweet deal front running trades by 1e-10 seconds so I also can scalp $0.0001 gain off each trade all day long. :)
DeleteBelieve it. I traded TZA twice today. Opened 17.56, closed 17.93. Reopened 18, closed 18.17. 500-share transactions only. It's a noticeable change in market character, IMO.
DeleteWow. I literally sold at the low of the day for ENPH!
ReplyDeleteWhat were you expecting, the algorithm is finely tuned and played you like a fiddle.
DeleteA barrel of laughs and a ton of fun, I'm beside myself as opposed to inside myself!
ReplyDeleteAny bets on TWTR going into Tuesday's earnings call?
ReplyDeleteI don't have the guts for a position. But I'm betting today's close will be a ST low.
Delete33 times ttm revenues? Shit I say it gets to $17
DeleteIn fact I think it eventually goes to $2-$3
DeletePFE - So if this company is relocating to the UK then shouldn't the jobs exported count towards US GDP?
ReplyDeleteOr to rephrase the question slightly, isn't the ultimate goal of the US econ policy supposed to entail export of low wage jobs as opposed to importing them?
DeleteI rolled into some tza after hrs at $17.53 just to play the off chance of a gap down
ReplyDeleteHA - Breakout knockout play?
ReplyDeleteTWTR at $2~$3, yep. sounds about par for the course.
ReplyDeleteIt's kind of a worthless company in my opinion. Basically a real time gossip / bulletin board. Should be worth $1 bill max IMO
DeleteI'm not arguing that, you most likely have a better idea of their earnings potential than I could hope to.
DeleteTSLA - Recovered back above the lower trend line but closed lower than the opening price.
ReplyDeleteAGCO - So why would this one fall all the way to $50 in just one month during January but refuse to revisit that level as "the entire market has clearly turned bearish"?
INTC - Topped at a 35% gain from $20, about the same gain as I saw at the peak from my entry on the BALT position.
ReplyDeleteI've been looking at amd lately actually. Any insight? Seems a turnaround in progress
DeleteINT - This one has not dropped in quite the same magnitude as some bulk shippers have.
ReplyDeleteBSBR got a buyout offer from SAN at a 20% premium; to close in Oct and be paid in SAN shares - news is under SAN symbol.
ReplyDeletePlus a slight beat on earnings for BSBR this morning, not that it should matter.
Bid/ask is $6.50 - $7.00, up from $5.78, so should be a good day for BSBR
FLWS, on the other hand, seems to be guiding down for the year based on the poor V-day execution and bad Q1 weather. Will be interesting to see if we get a stock drop on this or if it was already in the price.
ReplyDeleteCanadian energy company, SU, reported great numbers as well. Energy seems to be in a very good spot and there are a lot of tailwinds for the Canadian energy companies with the C$ depreciating (makes revenue per barrel of oil go up as these are priced in US$) and better transportation methods for getting Canadian oil to market are found - this reduced the differential between WTI oil and Canadian oil prices, again increasing revenues.
ReplyDeleteSuncor (SU, SU.TO) late on Monday reported Q1 2014 net earnings of C$1.485 billion, or C$1.01 per share, up from C$1.094 billion, or C$0.72 per share, a year ago. On average, analysts were expecting C$0.94, according to Capital IQ. The increase in earnings was driven by favorable foreign exchange and increased inland crude pricing, the energy company said.
During the quarter, total upstream production was 545,300 barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from 596,100 boe/d in Q1 2013, following the sale of the conventional natural gas business and the shut-in of production in Libya. BNN TV Monday said that despite one of the company's key oil sands upgraders being closed for maintenance since March 11, RBC's Greg Pardy has been expecting Suncor to report "strong" oil sands production averaging about 420,000 barrels per day during the first three months of the year.
Pretty good summary of why to own SU here - http://seekingalpha.com/article/2171163-suncor-energy-record-q1-results
DeleteReality is that it is a large cap though, so you can get better leverage through smallcaps, but it's a good long term hold if you want and above market energy grower. I personally look at it as an offset to my gasoline purchases for my car.
Who do we know that plans to harvest methane off the ocean floor?
DeleteBsbr - tweedy Browne has to be pissed no?
ReplyDeleteNot sure what their cost was, but it was their 2nd largest holding, so I'd think they would have been looking for more than this.
DeleteIt is a bit opportunistic of SAN, considering they IPO'd the BSBR shares at around $11 I think, but I'm OK with it - I think is about a 33% return counting the return of principal last year in about 8 months.
Doing some thinking today about whether to sell or take the SAN shares. Spain seems to be recovering, so owning SAN, even though it is only about 20% of their business, might be a good one to take.
According to my info the dividend is 14%, so it's hard to sell considering the longer time horizon.
DeleteI'm wondering if rather than selling BSBR it might be better to buy BAC?
DeleteFLWS - Hmm, the pre-market bids aren't exactly indicative of excessive enthusiasm...
ReplyDeleteSomeone wanted out all week, that was a good clue,
DeleteI'm going to keep holding. I'm pretty sure Q4 (next quarter) will be good with Easter falling into the quarter, so that could get things back up. It's a little expensive on a P/E basis (p/e=23, fwd p/e=16), but I still like their position in the market and I think the V-day fiasco shows demand for their service is high and, assuming management is anything but crap, they should be much better prepared for future events.
DeleteWell management managed to get this far so maybe they know what they're doing or have arrived at their ultimate level of incompetency?
DeleteI like that it isn't just continuing to careen down the cliff.
BSBR - Up 19%, eh? Is that right?
ReplyDeleteRe SAN, the dividend is around 6.5% according to Yahoo and Morningstar.
ReplyDeleteYeah I know, according to my broker it's much higher so maybe they are counting the special divs, I dunno. Have been meaning to visit BSBR's web site and get the straight dope.
DeleteRight now I'm trying to see if methane hydrates might have a chance to become the new green fuel and replace other methods of energy production b/c the ocean warming is a fact and we should be harvesting those methane deposits which will evaporate up into and saturate ocean water consuming oxygen in the water and eventually migrate into the atmosphere and raise the CO2 background anyway, as opposed to unearthing new carbon which is in steady-state and would lay dormant for eternity otherwise.
CP,
ReplyDeleteBAC is probably good at some point. I just don't like the way they seem to have lawsuits and problems quarter after quarter. Look at this quarter with the issues again. Makes me question how strong management is. But I do believe their underlying business is good, so at some point the value should come through.
Yeah, it's just that BAC is one company that won't fail and once they work though this rough patch of hurdles it will be much higher. That is, assuming we're not all going to hell in a hand basket first, before emerging out the other side.
DeleteI was looking at SAN yesterday actually. Quite a run on that one.
ReplyDeleteStill looks bullish to me:
ReplyDeletehttp://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=TZA&p=D&b=5&g=0&id=p78354496367
Smallcaps have had such a good run. A pullback, even a small bear market makes sense. But Bloomberg reporting hedge funds very short small caps - http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-27/hedge-funds-short-small-caps-most-since-04-russell-falls.html
DeleteSo, may get some fast bounces, but I still think the whole small cap to large cap, growth to value rotation is in play.
I think you really want to know what you own and why in this market.
I agree on both fronts. While the put/call ratios aren't high nor is the VIX it does seem that traders are trying to push on a string. Having said that, I still see plenty of examples of people trying to catch bottoms in momentum stocks. That needs to evaporate to get a true bottom in those.
Delete"I think you really want to know what you own and why in this market."
DeleteQuite right, and if I could've mustered some courage I'd of doubled up on FLWS early this morning! Seriously, I was thinking it could go to low $4's and still kinda wonder if it might still.
I just took a screen shot to remember this: DATE is actually up today for the first time in like 10 weeks!
ReplyDeleteSNE still looks good. I managed to restart a position yesterday but unfortunately it wasn't near the lows of the day but rather the highs of the day as I was too busy stopping myself out of ENPH at the lows of this recent downtrend.
CIE - $18.41 is the bullish entry target for today.
ReplyDeletePBR just broke a downtrend from 2009. Pretty damn bullish looking to me.
ReplyDeleteKinda looks like a $4 upside target from here. Wow $10 would've been a great entry except for some reason I don't trust the company, seems like some wishy-washy stuff has been going on.
Delete500 years worth of CO2 emissions are estimated to be trapped in methane hydrates on ocean floors, of course not all of it is warming at the same rate but the ocean temp rise is having an impact. So why unearth carbon that's locked in stable deposits in order to manufacture green energy sources and burn for fuel, etc. as opposed to attempting to capture and use this energy source that surely will be liberated into the environment instead? This might be one reason why Elon Musk is so dead-set on establishing interplanetary colonies?
ReplyDelete"Based on geological records it can be assumed that hydrates have broken down on a large scale numerous times in the Earth’s history, leading to extreme global warming and massive extinctions of organisms on the sea floor."
Wonder if this might become the source of hydrogen I keep wondering about where it will be coming from, we treat these hydrates with CO2 to liberate the hydrogen? Not sure, just thinking out loud (loosely)
Delete"The basic idea is very simple: the methane (CH4) is harvested from the hydrates by replacing it with CO2. Laboratory studies show that this is possible in theory because liquid carbon dioxide reacts spontaneously with methane hydrate. If this concept could become economically viable, it would be a win-win situation, because the gas exchange in the hydrates would be attractive both from a financial and a climate perspective."
http://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/energy/methane-hydrates/2/
Have you guys been hearing anything about this at all?
Nope, not me.
DeleteGoing on the premise that man evolves externally, I'm thinking the scale of this is potentially enough or near, for man's continued extension of control over his environment.
DeleteAnd no, I don't hear much reference on this subject either but just learned a few days ago that northern grass lands (near polar) that have died out or are dying (going extinct) are/were responsible for sequestering twice the volume of carbon than all the Earth's rainforests put together. Grasses in the tundra are also responsible for insulating the permafrost during warm months and the idea was to attempt reestablishing these northern grass lands.
Makes sense to me, managing environmental projects like this seems a better alternative than destroying habitat equivalent to the entire state of Texas by covering with solar panels which humans have to manufacture using hydrocarbons and metals excavated from the earth. About everything we do such as constructing roofs has some sort of an environmental impact. I've watched as thunder storms follow along highways in the summertime heat supposing as the storm approaches the heated surface of the pavement the natural course of the storm is changed, now even some of these highways are being reconstructed in a variety of colors intended to reduce the impact.
TOF,
ReplyDeleteI would definitely agree that there is too much bottom fishing in the momo stocks, but they can go a lot further than many people think.
Look at the long term chart of NFLX - https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=NFLX#symbol=NFLX;range=my
If I was a pure chart guy, I'd say the downturn now sure looks similar to 2011's, in which case, the decline has only started.
I still go back to the fact that traders rarely stop a decline as traders play for the bounce or get stopped out. Investors buy and hold longer term and will live with downturns because they see the value or growth to justify the stock price. None of the investor types I follow or chat with are interested in any of these stocks at all.
A lot of them like energy stocks though and your PBR makes sense as PBR is good value, Brazil seems to moving, energy is moving, so energy and Brazil together should be a good combination.
The only small cap I'm holding right now is DATE and I'm in the investor category as far as holding through the dip because its really the only small cap China stock I follow that I feel comfortable with as far as transparency, conservative management, and income growth.
DeleteAveraged down on TZA and sold at a loss. That makes two in a row. Given how easy it was to trade TZA previously, maybe a change is occurring? Tough to say for sure as we're ahead of what will most likely be a very volatile few days and this could just be a sideways consolidation before a move lower again for small caps.
ReplyDeleteI picked up a few things today. Added more SNE and picked up a little DE.
Also considering picking up PBR. Not the greatest entry but if it can hold here into the close then it looks like its going a lot higher. Valuation supports a higher price.
DeleteDo you know why PBR is so cheap? I figure it's easily worth double just with a quick look at the numbers. Is there government involvement holding down the price?
DeleteYep there is which is what made me a bit cautious at $11 when I was looking at it. Here's more info
DeleteA Supreme Court minister sided with opposition parties by saying the minority in Congress has the right to pursue an investigation focused on Petroleo Brasileiro SA, the government-controlled blue chip known as Petrobras.
The company's management is accused of mishandling a major acquisition of a U.S. refinery in 2006. The case is a potential setback to Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff, who at the time was Petrobras' chairwoman and authorized the deal.
The case has gained political importance because Brazilians will vote for president in October and Ms. Rousseff is likely to seek a second term.
Opposition parties in Congress have sought to open a parliamentary investigation on Petrobras, which could become an embarrassment for Ms. Dilma and her Worker's Party, known as PT.
The PT and its allies, which form a majority in Congress, have tried to defuse the potential investigation by proposing that not only Petrobras, but also other alleged illegal operations done by firms linked to Ms. Rousseff's main opponents in the election.
Kinda the way I heard it reminded me of the CHK debacle from a couple years ago where the CEO was granting himself assets from under the table. Whether or or not there's any truth to it is beyond me but I took my tiny gain from a bounce and ran.
DeleteOh, and PBR was another Bill Cara Jewel (r) (rights reserved), similar to SVM and all the other mysterious picks that all rolled like crack whores.
DeleteLooks like I won't be buying the "breakout" given the failure to follow through. I do think it looks cheap on paper but that's most likely for a reason.
DeleteHave you had a look at AMD? I know that's up your alley. Seems to me that the company is turning things around nicely but I don't know enough about the business they're in to say for sure.
Even though I took Computer Science is school and worked at Oracle and a couple of other tech companies, I'm not really a tech investor and especially not a hardware investor. I just find with most tech, valuations are high relative to other industries and prospects less secure. If I was going to buy tech stocks, I'd be looking at the big moat companies like MSFT, ORCL, SAP, IBM, etc. where the valuations are reasonable and the revenues solid.
DeleteThe only tech companies I own are IT consulting company GIB (recent purchase) and SVC.TO which does deep packet inspection and the main reason I am in that one is a good investor friend of mine laid it all out for me.
AMD - Yeah, I guess you could say I managed to put this sector out of mind about the time they were bottoming last summer.
DeleteCome on Tweedy, stop selling this is driving me nuts!
ReplyDeleteMan, why is it so many retail web sites insist on loading so many wonderful "features" such as a ton of scripts and meaningless crap into their pages that repel me from accessing their storefronts and make it more of a painful experience than I think it has or needs to be?
ReplyDeleteTransferring data from:______ F__k it, close the tab, no sale.
DeleteThe web site that is driving me nuts is download.com / cnet.com
DeleteUsed to be a great place to get software, but now they endlessly try to trick into installing crap along with the software you really want.
Thanks for the warning, I can hardly wait.
DeleteBest quote yet from Kass: 'Twitter is in the shitter.'
ReplyDeleteGo Clippers!
DeleteAnd EBAY!
DeleteOpened just 200 shares of the shitter @ 37.89...
ReplyDeleteYour on a roll CP!
ReplyDeleteThe Clippers for two, and a red on EBAY.
Deletenew post
ReplyDelete