Friday, July 30, 2010

7/30/10 Slow Dance on the Killing Ground



Man I am embarrassed to tell you that today I gave it all back in one ----ing trade. My 4-figure gain for the week flipped into a 3-figure loss in 4 hours and 27 minutes.

Opened TZA @ 32.94 reflexively as a short squeeze hit the tape at 642 am (pst), closed @ 32.07 as a broad market sell-off briefly materialized at 1109 am (pst). Larger than normal position. It went green almost immediately. However, greed won over common sense, as I sat back, confident that the morning sell-off would resume almost immediately. Instead, we all know what happened.

But there's good news. It was a 4-figure loss for most of the morning. Only my 'blind faith' in human nature gave me the confidence to hold the position (for 4 1/2 hours,!) until I saw a print that spelled 'breakeven' (for the week), and clicked Sell as quickly as I could. In fact, had I sold the position exactly 16 seconds earlier, I would have ended up flat.

As it is, I end the week down -191.89.

I really believed we would see at least -250 points on the DJIA today. For crying out loud, didn't TLT close near the high? Got played by the Market once again. At least I didn't hand over my wallet at the highs of the day. No, I was able to hold my own to an even draw for the week. Next round Monday.

65 comments:

  1. Honestly, my 'head' can't make up its mind- whether to

    (a) feel 'bad' about ending the week with a bad trade, or to

    (b) feel 'good' about making a decisive (yet losing) bet on a sharp sell-off- and then pulling out of a nosedive to land safely on neutral territory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's all good. I did what Mary Decker should have done- rather than feel cheated out of a win by Zola Budd, I took responsibility for a losing bet and made the best of it.

    Besides, if I can't handle a -$200 loss for the week, what am I doing on the field?

    I'm just pissed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joining Kyle on the Scotch bender.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Purple Heather- Would someone who knows how please post a version of the Van Morrison song on youtube for next week's edition of Trading Topics?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not sure whether I'd be up or down right now if I hadn't closed out Thur. morning. But nothing ran away from me so the decision is still mine....Well RBY kinda did, but I've never followed that sucker. Just catching a ride with Cheapy on that one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 2nd - It's a very tricky tape. I let a small BGZ gain turn into a small (unrealized) loss but, like you, I'm just looking at the $SPX chart and seeing, at least the potential, for a pullback to the 50DMA (1081). BUT WTF do any of us know...

    ReplyDelete
  7. shark- Cruising downtown with your new Toyota pick-up?

    ReplyDelete
  8. 2nd- Who's turn is it to wait up for Sharkie?


    Funny line BTW. Took me a snap to get it :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kyle- I for one claim not to know ---- when it comes to explaining this tape. I just can't explain it. It's like swatting a soap bubble that keeps floating.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mark- You need to catch up to Kyle and me. Then you won't need to work at it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I can wait up for sharkie. I just sleep 8 hours and still have time to make coffee before he comes home.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mark- Ted mentioned that this morning rates hit the lowest he's seen this year. It's just a matter of time before they hit my target.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 4.5% right? I've got all my crap ready. It's a little more involved being self employed.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 2nd - There's a Swirling, a Levitation, that's going on (just like the '09 market lift) and it just keeps going & going...like the Energizer Bunny. Everything I see w/ national govt. & local govt. etc looks dysfunctional, but it doesn't seem to matter. If it's a swing trade & you hang it out there for too long (like a few hours, 1-2 days) it's going to get chopped off...

    ReplyDelete
  15. If anyone can handle it, he can.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I like that. 'A Swirling, A Levitation.'

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kinda the same thing here Kyle. Oakland just laid off 80 police officers and San Jose 30 firemen. Thing that REALLY pisses me of about it is the concessions asked of both unions to avoid any lay offs weren't that much. So much for the "brotherhood". If they get rehired, if I had voted against "them" as a "brother", I'd never be able to lok them in the eye.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 2nd- I think Kyle was talking about himself right now ;)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, I'm doing the same. 'A Curling. A Meditation.'

    Hoping for 'An Unfurling. No Hesitation.'

    Alright. Too much curling.

    How many books have been written with that muse? I'll bet Hemingway wrote entire books sitting at the table with her.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Heck, mankind has engaged in world wars under her influence.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Make that, 'has entered into world wars...'

    ReplyDelete
  22. But let's get back to the markets.

    I really believe there is an 'explanation' to the 'levitation,' and that is has nothing to do with 'manipulation.'

    ReplyDelete
  23. What in the world are you guys smoking out there on the left coast????

    Mark - Good illustration re officers & firemen. Every issue that comes up has some twist/turn associated with it. It should be straight-forward but the more you hear, the more nuance and in general, jacked-up everything is.

    ReplyDelete
  24. When a crowd of people are engaged in 'gaming' each other, unexpected outcomes are bound to occur.

    ReplyDelete
  25. And if one decides to play with leveraged ETFs, the 'unexpected outcomes' are magnified.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hence the correlation btw leveraged ETFs and ubiquitous WTFs.

    ReplyDelete
  27. And on Friday nights, 'beveraged WTFs.'

    Damn, what AM I smoking?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Catch you guys tomorrow. BTW, I liked the Sunday evening sessions, but in this market, I'm not really sure if individual stocks have much chance of trending very far...

    ReplyDelete
  29. Kyle- Funny. (Individual stocks)....I think that's going to be the ONLY way to make money over the next few months.

    ReplyDelete
  30. How is it possible to design a derivative that returns 3x the gains/losses in an underlying index in real time, without unduly affecting the underlying indexes in unexpected ways? I think it's reasonable to think it happens.

    ReplyDelete
  31. If there is undue demand for TZA relative to TNA, how does that affect the Russell 2000?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think the Russell 2000 becomes hyper-vulnerable to short squeezes.

    ReplyDelete
  33. What I don't understand is how those funds make any money for themselves, but obviously they do. If I buy at $1 sell the same day @ $2, how do they make money? On the cash float?

    ReplyDelete
  34. From a purely psychological standpoint, isn't it reasonable to think that TZA holders are many times more nervous/'trigger happy' than holders of traditional shorts? Of course! Not only are they exposed 3x more, but the kind of person who plays them (mirror, mirror) is probably a trigger-happy personality to begin with ;)

    ReplyDelete
  35. To be clear, what I mean is, if I buy 100 shares @ 1$, I get 100 shares. Where's the vig?

    ReplyDelete
  36. One thing I'm certain of is that they take advantage of the 'situation' any way they can. That's human nature. It just happens.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Taylor Mays has a chance to be another Ronnie Lott. Crazy, I know, but from a few friends of mine he's the real deal...Kinda like Kendra ;)

    ReplyDelete
  38. OK, but other than the brokers getting their fee on fickle fingers, where's theirs?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Trust me, they'll find a way. It won't necessarily be 'obvious,' and they certainly won't be telling us about it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Come on, man. You read Liar's Poker, right? How about 'Den of Thieves?' You think these guys are any different?

    ReplyDelete
  41. If they find a way to skim a penny off each transaction, that's enough to fund a lavish lifestyle. But there's always more than one 'hand' in the pot. So I'm sure it's a lot more money we're talking about. Everyone involved in the process needs to be compensated.

    The thing for us is to accept it and forget about it. It really doesn't matter much. Our game is different- to a great extent, it's recognizing that there are (predictable) opportunities created whenever human nature is involved.

    ReplyDelete
  42. TZA

    15 million shares per day

    .01*15,000,000=150,000

    150,000*250 days = $37,500,000

    ReplyDelete
  43. T3D- Ok, it must be. But how does that effect us when I get a fill at my price and a sell at my price?

    ReplyDelete
  44. IE...Where does it come out of?

    ReplyDelete
  45. Mark, the answer most likely is in the prospectus. Unless you have a burning desire to know how they make money off us I would not worry about it. Or happy reading as I use etf's very little. If you look at quite a few charts, etf's had some of the worst drops during the flash crash.

    It is known that very knowledge people in the field just rip a new a-hole on those who invest in commodities funds long-term that are in contango.

    Never underestimate Wall Streets ability to create a product that milks us.

    Since many here are hyper-traders (neither a good thing or a bad thing)your brokers are the ones who probably make out best and the market makers who are scalping that penny.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Mark, I take it that Kendra kicks predominately with her right foot. I could be wrong here. If I'm not, have her start practicing kicking with her left foot (most likely weaker)too. This will make her a much more crafty player as she ages and could be potentially worth millions in she becomes one of the really gifted world class women soccer players.

    For drill take some of the same photo shots but have her kick the ball with her left foot and compare form. IMO she should practice this now when she is young and it is much easier to learn and be consistent about practicing it. Just an observation.

    If memory serves me, the goal that Spain won the World Cup with was kicked with the guys left foot. I remember thinking how impressed I was that he could kick it which such authority on that side.

    ReplyDelete
  47. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPEWwZ7o57I

    ReplyDelete
  48. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URLRbxJcMsw&feature=related

    one more

    ReplyDelete
  49. I sure do know what its like to lose a month's winnings on 1 bad trade. I forget what day it was, maybe 2 or 3 days ago. I thought it would take a month to make it back, but got lucky and made it back in a day. What if I hadn't? Why did I buy it? Why did I give up and sell? Had I held it till tonight, I'd have been up $75k on it instead of losing $10k.

    I guess I should look at the chart for any clues I missed that would have told me to keep waiting instead of buying...

    ReplyDelete
  50. FWIW...SIAM (Society of Industrial & Applied Mathematics) started a Journal on Financial Mathematics this year. These papers are mainly theoretical; however, a recent paper addressed leveraged ETFs...

    http://siamdl.aip.org/sifin

    It's the next to last pdf (pp. 586-603) in this list:

    http://siamdl.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=SJFMBJ&Volume=1&Issue=1

    ReplyDelete
  51. T3D- VERY good observation. I like the idea about the drill. And your correct about using your left. Chase, our nephew, who got the full ride @ Oregon State, did so because he play's left striker. Friggin rocket with his left foot.

    Not interested enough in the ETF thing to actually read the prospectus. Just curious, and I'm well aware about the inherent problems with then as a LT hold. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  52. PXP - Wonder if it'll retest the lower trendline once again?

    I just don't know where this market's going from here but longer term I'm still positive. People aren't about to live in caves but they will be much more frugal going forward. So the question in my mind is how do we capitalize on that?

    ReplyDelete
  53. PXP- Sure seems like there's an underlying bid @ 20ish.

    ReplyDelete
  54. PXP put/call ratio was .04 on Friday.

    http://www.marketintellisearch.com/articles/1034896.html

    ReplyDelete
  55. CB bob,
    http://siamdl.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=SJFMBJ&Volume=1&Issue=1

    looks like a natural to ease some of your laments. i can envision our cb forecasts rolling off your screens in re: xxx


    Minimizing the Expected Market Time to Reach a Certain Wealth Level

    Convergence by Viscosity Methods in Multiscale Financial Models with Stochastic Volatility

    Short-Maturity Asymptotics for a Fast Mean-Reverting Heston Stochastic Volatility Model.

    u da man
    e5

    ReplyDelete
  56. CB/e5- I took a shot at the article. WAY over my pin head. If you guys understand them, congrats!

    ReplyDelete
  57. hey bob,
    kyle posted the citations; wikipedia does a good job explaining the algos and kyle, probably will help you plug in stuff. try wiki.....Heston Stochastic Volatility Model.

    e5

    ReplyDelete
  58. There's actually quite a bit of free code out there. If you don't have MATLAB try OCTAVE (it's free and what I use):

    http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/

    Here are some links to code that might be of interest:

    http://www.global-derivatives.com/index.php/pricing-models-othermenu-41

    http://www.math.ku.dk/~rolf/teaching/ctff03/9binomialways.pdf

    http://www.dipic.unipd.it/Impianti/Profs/Canu/files/tmp/sde/rep26.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  59. e5,

    That stuff is way too tricky for me. I'm the kind of guy that just would like to KEEP the relative purchasing power of the assets I already have, and add $500 or $1000 a day to it before its debased to worthlessness. I live pretty frugally compared to most with my means, , and it wasn't always this way, but anymore, I don't need to actually make anything at all, to be able to live comfortably for the rest of my life, but I do like to win just for grins. It gives me a reason to get out of bed and fight the good fight, and celebrate the wins, if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  60. A very insightful commentary on the economy vs. corporate EPS is here: http://www.consumerindexes.com/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  61. Here is a nice recent article about ECU silver:

    http://www.ecu.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=410%3Aecu-silver-edges-closer-to-senior-production-in-mexico&catid=74%3A2010&Itemid=216&lang=en

    I currently have 20% of my port in ECU, and if ECU drops to CAD$0.52 during the next leg down in the stock market, I'll bump up my position to 25% of my port.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Cheapy not so cheap,

    I relate to you on some levels. I live frugally by choice. My Federal pension is protected by COLA, FWIW, so I don't need to depend on my rather meager capital to a large extent. I am, however, fixed on preserving it for my offspring intact including inflation effects and hopefully more. When I go, so does the pension except for a survivor annuity.

    You have the "golden handshake". I have the "Uncle Sam handshake". Interesting juxtaposition. I believe you win bigger but may be more dependent on Mr Market.

    ReplyDelete